docs: fix contradictory Quinn workflow placement in testing reference (#1911)

The testing reference page incorrectly described Quinn's Automate
workflow as running per-story before Code Review, contradicting the
workflow map which positions it after epic completion. Align the testing
page with the workflow map: Quinn runs after all stories in an epic are
implemented and code-reviewed.
This commit is contained in:
Nikolas Hor 2026-03-12 00:35:27 -03:00 committed by GitHub
parent 9cd362d2d8
commit df9a7f9b67
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -95,11 +95,11 @@ TEA also supports P0-P3 risk-based prioritization and optional integrations with
## How Testing Fits into Workflows ## How Testing Fits into Workflows
Quinn's Automate workflow appears in Phase 4 (Implementation) of the BMad Method workflow map. A typical sequence: Quinn's Automate workflow appears in Phase 4 (Implementation) of the BMad Method workflow map. It is designed to run **after a full epic is complete** — once all stories in an epic have been implemented and code-reviewed. A typical sequence:
1. Implement a story with the Dev workflow (`DS`) 1. For each story in the epic: implement with Dev (`DS`), then validate with Code Review (`CR`)
2. Generate tests with Quinn (`QA`) or TEA's Automate workflow 2. After the epic is complete: generate tests with Quinn (`QA`) or TEA's Automate workflow
3. Validate implementation with Code Review (`CR`) 3. Run retrospective (`bmad-retrospective`) to capture lessons learned
Quinn works directly from source code without loading planning documents (PRD, architecture). TEA workflows can integrate with upstream planning artifacts for traceability. Quinn works directly from source code without loading planning documents (PRD, architecture). TEA workflows can integrate with upstream planning artifacts for traceability.