docs: fix contradictory Quinn workflow placement in testing reference (#1911)
The testing reference page incorrectly described Quinn's Automate workflow as running per-story before Code Review, contradicting the workflow map which positions it after epic completion. Align the testing page with the workflow map: Quinn runs after all stories in an epic are implemented and code-reviewed.
This commit is contained in:
parent
9cd362d2d8
commit
df9a7f9b67
|
|
@ -95,11 +95,11 @@ TEA also supports P0-P3 risk-based prioritization and optional integrations with
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## How Testing Fits into Workflows
|
## How Testing Fits into Workflows
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Quinn's Automate workflow appears in Phase 4 (Implementation) of the BMad Method workflow map. A typical sequence:
|
Quinn's Automate workflow appears in Phase 4 (Implementation) of the BMad Method workflow map. It is designed to run **after a full epic is complete** — once all stories in an epic have been implemented and code-reviewed. A typical sequence:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Implement a story with the Dev workflow (`DS`)
|
1. For each story in the epic: implement with Dev (`DS`), then validate with Code Review (`CR`)
|
||||||
2. Generate tests with Quinn (`QA`) or TEA's Automate workflow
|
2. After the epic is complete: generate tests with Quinn (`QA`) or TEA's Automate workflow
|
||||||
3. Validate implementation with Code Review (`CR`)
|
3. Run retrospective (`bmad-retrospective`) to capture lessons learned
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Quinn works directly from source code without loading planning documents (PRD, architecture). TEA workflows can integrate with upstream planning artifacts for traceability.
|
Quinn works directly from source code without loading planning documents (PRD, architecture). TEA workflows can integrate with upstream planning artifacts for traceability.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue