diff --git a/docs/jus-ia-project/prd-validation-report.md b/docs/jus-ia-project/prd-validation-report.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fbfb2ec10
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/jus-ia-project/prd-validation-report.md
@@ -0,0 +1,456 @@
+---
+validationTarget: 'prd.md'
+validationDate: '2026-03-08'
+inputDocuments: [product-brief.md, brainstorm.md, research.md, 01-prompt-library.md, 02-calculadora-juridica.md, 03-dashboard-produtividade.md, 04-comunidade-prompts.md]
+validationStepsCompleted: [v-01-discovery, v-02-format, v-03-density, v-04-brief-coverage, v-05-measurability, v-06-traceability, v-07-implementation-leakage, v-08-domain-compliance, v-09-project-type, v-10-smart, v-11-holistic, v-12-completeness]
+validationStatus: COMPLETE
+---
+
+# PRD Validation Report
+
+**PRD Being Validated:** prd.md
+**Validation Date:** 2026-03-08
+
+## Input Documents
+
+- PRD: prd.md ✓
+- Product Brief: product-brief.md ✓
+- Brainstorm: brainstorm.md ✓
+- Research: research.md ✓
+- Project Docs: 01-prompt-library.md, 02-calculadora-juridica.md, 03-dashboard-produtividade.md, 04-comunidade-prompts.md ✓
+
+## Format Detection
+
+**PRD Structure (## Level 2 Headers):**
+1. Executive Summary
+2. Success Criteria
+3. Project Classification
+4. User Journeys
+5. Domain-Specific Requirements
+6. Web App Specific Requirements
+7. Project Scoping & Phased Development
+8. Functional Requirements
+9. Non-Functional Requirements
+
+**BMAD Core Sections Present:**
+- Executive Summary: Present ✓
+- Success Criteria: Present ✓
+- Product Scope: Present (absorbed into "Project Scoping & Phased Development") ✓
+- User Journeys: Present ✓
+- Functional Requirements: Present ✓
+- Non-Functional Requirements: Present ✓
+
+**Format Classification:** BMAD Standard
+**Core Sections Present:** 6/6
+
+## Information Density Validation
+
+**Anti-Pattern Violations:**
+
+**Conversational Filler:** 0 occurrences
+No instances of "The system will allow users to...", "It is important to note that...", "In order to", or Portuguese equivalents found. FRs use direct "Advogado pode" / "Sistema [verbo]" format.
+
+**Wordy Phrases:** 0 occurrences
+No instances of "Due to the fact that", "In the event of", "For the purpose of" or equivalents.
+
+**Redundant Phrases:** 0 occurrences
+No redundant constructions found.
+
+**Total Violations:** 0
+
+**Severity Assessment:** Pass
+
+**Recommendation:** PRD demonstrates excellent information density. Every sentence carries weight. Portuguese jurídico writing style is direct and concise throughout.
+
+## Product Brief Coverage
+
+**Product Brief:** product-brief.md
+
+### Coverage Map
+
+**Vision Statement:** Fully Covered
+Executive Summary captures: assistente web gratuito, fluxos guiados, URL parametrizada, elimina ciclo tentativa-e-erro.
+
+**Target Users:** Fully Covered
+Personas Carla, Rafael e Marcos aparecem como protagonistas das 4 User Journeys. Características de perfil embutidas nas narrativas.
+
+**Problem Statement:** Fully Covered
+Executive Summary: "79% nunca se capacitaram", "gap entre ter acesso à ferramenta e extrair valor real".
+
+**Key Features:** Fully Covered
+All 5 core features from brief (fluxo híbrido, 10 fluxos, redirect URL, zero fricção, analytics) covered in MVP Feature Set.
+
+**Goals/Objectives:** Fully Covered
+Success Criteria tables replicate and expand brief's metrics. North Star (1.000 redirects), taxa de conclusão (>60%), tempo (<5 min).
+
+**Differentiators:** Fully Covered
+"What Makes This Special" covers: interatividade condicional, base verificada 90M+ decisões, Stanford hallucination rates. All 6 differentiators from brief represented.
+
+**Constraints/Out of Scope:** Fully Covered
+"Explicitamente fora do MVP" list matches brief's "Out of Scope for MVP".
+
+**Party Mode Insights:** Fully Covered
+URL limit → FR20-22 (overflow handling). Custo IA → Risk table. Mobile-first → NFR11. Nome "Start Kit" → document title.
+
+### Coverage Summary
+
+**Overall Coverage:** ~98%
+**Critical Gaps:** 0
+**Moderate Gaps:** 0
+**Informational Gaps:** 1 — "Conversão redirect → assinante Jus IA" listed in brief's Business Objectives is explicitly excluded in PRD's "O que NÃO medimos" (intentional scoping decision)
+
+**Recommendation:** PRD provides excellent coverage of Product Brief content. The one intentional exclusion is well-justified.
+
+## Measurability Validation
+
+### Functional Requirements
+
+**Total FRs Analyzed:** 31
+
+**Format Violations:** 0
+All FRs follow "[Actor] pode [capability]" or "Sistema [capability]" pattern consistently.
+
+**Subjective Adjectives Found:** 1
+- FR30 (line ~360): "comunica claramente" — "claramente" is subjective. Suggest: "comunica com mensagem visível que o tipo de tarefa não está disponível"
+
+**Vague Quantifiers Found:** 0
+Quantifiers are specific: "10 fluxos" (FR10), "limite de caracteres" (FR20).
+
+**Implementation Leakage:** 0
+URL format `ia.jusbrasil.com.br/conversa?q=...&send` in FR18 is an integration spec (capability-relevant), not implementation detail.
+
+**FR Violations Total:** 1
+
+### Non-Functional Requirements
+
+**Total NFRs Analyzed:** 12
+
+**Missing Metrics:** 2
+- NFR1 (line ~367): "tempo razoável em conexão 3G/4G mobile" — "razoável" is unmeasurable. However, this is an intentional MVP decision (Technical Success: "sem meta rígida"). Informational, not critical.
+- NFR3 (line ~369): "sem delay perceptível além do carregamento da página" — defined by MPA architecture constraint, borderline acceptable.
+
+**Incomplete Template:** 0
+NFRs follow consistent format with clear conditions.
+
+**Missing Context:** 0
+
+**NFR Violations Total:** 2
+
+### Overall Assessment
+
+**Total Requirements:** 43 (31 FRs + 12 NFRs)
+**Total Violations:** 3
+
+**Severity:** Pass (< 5 violations)
+
+**Recommendation:** Requirements demonstrate good measurability. The 3 violations are minor — 2 are intentional MVP decisions documented in Success Criteria ("sem meta rígida"). Only FR30's "claramente" would benefit from a concrete revision.
+
+## Traceability Validation
+
+### Chain Validation
+
+**Executive Summary → Success Criteria:** Intact ✓
+- "elimina barreira" → User Success: >70% sem reformulação
+- "estratégia de expansão de GTM" → Business Success: 1.000 redirects
+- "sem login, sem dados retidos" → Technical Success: stateless, best-effort
+
+**Success Criteria → User Journeys:** Intact ✓
+- >60% conclusão → Jornada 1 (happy path completa em 4 min)
+- <5 min → Jornada 1 ("4 minutos"), Jornada 2 ("3 minutos")
+- >70% sem reformulação → Jornada 2 ("resultado sai melhor que qualquer tentativa anterior")
+- >30% referral → Jornada 1 (WhatsApp), Jornada 4 (grupo WhatsApp escritório)
+- Go/No-Go → Todas as jornadas demonstram fluxo completo
+
+**User Journeys → Functional Requirements:** Intact ✓
+
+| Jornada | Capabilities | FRs Correspondentes |
+|---------|-------------|-------------------|
+| 1 (Carla happy path) | Seleção, perguntas, IA, redirect, sharing | FR1-5, FR6-9, FR11-14, FR15-19, FR23-24 |
+| 2 (Rafael frustrado) | Fluxos especializados, fundamentação | FR6, FR10, FR16 |
+| 3 (Carla overflow) | Detecção overflow, fallback | FR20-22 |
+| 4 (Marcos escritório) | Deep links, governança | FR4, FR24 |
+
+**Scope → FR Alignment:** Intact ✓
+All 11 must-have capabilities from MVP Feature Set map to specific FRs.
+
+### Orphan Elements
+
+**Orphan Functional Requirements:** 0
+All FRs trace to at least one user journey or explicitly documented business need.
+
+**Unsupported Success Criteria:** 0
+
+**User Journeys Without FRs:** 0
+
+**Total Traceability Issues:** 0
+
+**Severity:** Pass
+
+**Recommendation:** Traceability chain is intact. Every FR traces to a user journey or business objective. No orphan requirements.
+
+## Implementation Leakage Validation
+
+### Leakage by Category
+
+**Frontend Frameworks:** 0 violations
+**Backend Frameworks:** 0 violations
+**Databases:** 0 violations
+**Cloud Platforms:** 0 violations
+**Infrastructure:** 0 violations
+**Libraries:** 0 violations
+
+**Other Implementation Details:** 0 true violations
+
+Terms found but capability-relevant (not leakage):
+- "LLM" in FR11, FR13, NFR2, NFR5 — describes AI capability component, no specific LLM named
+- "URL parametrizada" / `ia.jusbrasil.com.br/conversa?q=...&send` in FR18, NFR7 — integration specification
+- "OG tags" in FR23, NFR12 — web standard capability for WhatsApp sharing
+- "Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Edge" in NFR10 — browser compatibility requirement
+- "3G/4G" in NFR1 — connectivity context
+- "MPA" in Web App Requirements section (not in FRs/NFRs)
+
+### Summary
+
+**Total Implementation Leakage Violations:** 0
+
+**Severity:** Pass
+
+**Recommendation:** No implementation leakage found. Requirements properly specify WHAT without HOW. Technology terms present are capability-relevant integration specifications.
+
+## Domain Compliance Validation
+
+**Domain:** Legaltech
+**Complexity:** High (regulated)
+
+### Required Special Sections (from domain-complexity.csv)
+
+| Requirement | Status | Notes |
+|-------------|--------|-------|
+| ethics_compliance | Addressed | "ética OAB / disclaimer de IA: responsabilidade do Jus IA" — explicitly delegated to destination product |
+| data_retention | Addressed | "dados transitam pelo backend apenas para refinamento por IA e são descartados após redirect" + NFR4-5 |
+| confidentiality_measures | Addressed | Stateless architecture: sem login, sem cookies, sem persistência. NFR6 |
+| court_integration | Addressed | "Integração com tribunais: inexistente — redirect unidirecional apenas" |
+
+### Domain-Specific Analysis
+
+The PRD explicitly addresses each legaltech concern from the CSV and explains WHY it doesn't apply to this specific product (stateless, no persistence, unidirectional redirect). This is excellent domain awareness — acknowledging concerns and documenting the reasoning for non-applicability rather than ignoring them.
+
+**Constraint residual** correctly identified: templates require legal expertise (domainKnowledge = high), impacting content creation cost, not architecture.
+
+### Summary
+
+**Required Sections Present:** 4/4 addressed
+**Compliance Gaps:** 0
+
+**Severity:** Pass
+
+**Recommendation:** All domain compliance sections are addressed. The PRD demonstrates strong domain awareness by explicitly explaining why each legaltech concern is either delegated (to Jus IA) or not applicable (stateless architecture).
+
+## Project-Type Compliance Validation
+
+**Project Type:** web_app
+
+### Required Sections (from project-types.csv)
+
+| Section | Status | Notes |
+|---------|--------|-------|
+| browser_matrix | Present ✓ | NFR10: Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Edge (evergreen) |
+| responsive_design | Present ✓ | Responsive Design section + NFR11 mobile-first |
+| performance_targets | Present ✓ | Performance Targets table (razoável em mobile) |
+| seo_strategy | Present ✓ | "SEO: Não é prioridade — OG tags para WhatsApp preview" |
+| accessibility_level | Present ✓ | "Acessibilidade: Não é prioridade no MVP" |
+
+### Excluded Sections (Should Not Be Present)
+
+| Section | Status |
+|---------|--------|
+| native_features | Absent ✓ |
+| cli_commands | Absent ✓ |
+
+### Compliance Summary
+
+**Required Sections:** 5/5 present
+**Excluded Sections Present:** 0 (should be 0)
+**Compliance Score:** 100%
+
+**Severity:** Pass
+
+**Recommendation:** All required sections for web_app are present. No excluded sections found. SEO and accessibility are acknowledged and deprioritized with reasoning — valid for MVP.
+
+## SMART Requirements Validation
+
+**Total Functional Requirements:** 31
+
+### Scoring Summary
+
+**All scores ≥ 3:** 100% (31/31)
+**All scores ≥ 4:** 90% (28/31)
+**Overall Average Score:** 4.5/5.0
+
+### Low-Scoring FRs (any dimension < 4)
+
+| FR | Dimension | Score | Issue | Suggestion |
+|----|-----------|-------|-------|-----------|
+| FR12 | Specific | 3 | "perguntas adicionais geradas pela IA" — quais tipos de perguntas? | Adicionar: "ex: clarificação de fatos, perguntas de contexto" |
+| FR16 | Specific | 3 | "fundamentação jurídica relevante" — quais critérios de relevância? | O critério é definido pelo template por subtipo, não pela FR genérica. Aceitável para PRD level. |
+| FR30 | Measurable | 3 | "comunica claramente" — subjetivo | Reescrever: "exibe mensagem informando que o tipo de tarefa não está disponível" |
+
+### Overall Assessment
+
+**Severity:** Pass (< 10% flagged)
+
+**Recommendation:** Functional Requirements demonstrate strong SMART quality. 90% score ≥ 4 across all dimensions. Only FR30 needs a concrete revision to remove subjectivity. FR12 and FR16 have inherent variability (AI-generated content, legal domain) that makes hyper-specificity at PRD level impractical.
+
+## Holistic Quality Assessment
+
+### Document Flow & Coherence
+
+**Assessment:** Good (4/5)
+
+**Strengths:**
+- Narrative flow from vision → metrics → journeys → requirements is logical and compelling
+- User journeys are vivid and concrete — stakeholders can visualize the product
+- "What Makes This Special" section immediately differentiates
+- Go/No-Go criteria are clear and actionable
+- Portuguese jurídico writing style is authentic and domain-appropriate
+
+**Areas for Improvement:**
+- "Project Classification" between Success Criteria and User Journeys interrupts the narrative slightly (minor)
+- Domain Requirements section is very concise — correct for this product but could feel sparse to readers unfamiliar with the reasoning
+
+### Dual Audience Effectiveness
+
+**For Humans:**
+- Executive-friendly: Excellent — Executive Summary + Go/No-Go give clear decision framework
+- Developer clarity: Good — FRs are clear capabilities, NFRs define constraints
+- Designer clarity: Good — User Journeys provide interaction flow context
+- Stakeholder decision-making: Excellent — metrics, Go/No-Go, explicit exclusions
+
+**For LLMs:**
+- Machine-readable structure: Excellent — consistent ## headers, tables, numbered FRs
+- UX readiness: Good — journeys provide flow context, but no wireframe-level detail (appropriate for PRD)
+- Architecture readiness: Good — stateless, MPA, LLM backend, analytics clearly specified
+- Epic/Story readiness: Good — FRs map cleanly to stories, capabilities table provides natural epic boundaries
+
+**Dual Audience Score:** 4/5
+
+### BMAD PRD Principles Compliance
+
+| Principle | Status | Notes |
+|-----------|--------|-------|
+| Information Density | Met | Zero filler, dense writing, every sentence carries weight |
+| Measurability | Partial | 40/43 requirements measurable. NFR1 "razoável" is intentional MVP softness |
+| Traceability | Met | Complete chain: vision → criteria → journeys → FRs, zero orphans |
+| Domain Awareness | Met | Legaltech concerns explicitly addressed with reasoning |
+| Zero Anti-Patterns | Met | No filler, no vague quantifiers, no conversational padding |
+| Dual Audience | Met | Works for humans (narrative) and LLMs (structured) |
+| Markdown Format | Met | Clean ## structure, consistent tables, proper formatting |
+
+**Principles Met:** 6.5/7 (Measurability is partial due to 3 soft NFRs)
+
+### Overall Quality Rating
+
+**Rating:** 4/5 - Good
+
+Strong PRD with minor improvements needed. Ready for downstream work (UX, Architecture, Epics) with high confidence.
+
+### Top 3 Improvements
+
+1. **FR30: Remove "claramente"**
+   Replace with concrete behavior: "exibe mensagem informando que o tipo de tarefa não está disponível, com sugestão de fluxos disponíveis"
+
+2. **NFR1: Add loose performance target**
+   Even "best-effort" benefits from a sanity check. Suggest: "Páginas carregam em <5s em 3G e <2s em 4G como guideline (não blocker)"
+
+3. **Add explicit persona summary before journeys**
+   The PRD relies on journeys to introduce personas. A 3-line persona summary table before journeys would improve LLM parseability for downstream UX work without adding significant content.
+
+### Summary
+
+**This PRD is:** a well-crafted, information-dense document that tells a compelling product story while providing precise requirements for downstream work. Minor refinements would elevate it from Good to Excellent.
+
+## Completeness Validation
+
+### Template Completeness
+
+**Template Variables Found:** 0
+No template variables remaining ✓
+
+### Content Completeness by Section
+
+| Section | Status |
+|---------|--------|
+| Executive Summary | Complete ✓ |
+| Success Criteria | Complete ✓ |
+| Project Classification | Complete ✓ |
+| User Journeys | Complete ✓ |
+| Domain-Specific Requirements | Complete ✓ |
+| Web App Specific Requirements | Complete ✓ |
+| Project Scoping & Phased Development | Complete ✓ |
+| Functional Requirements | Complete ✓ |
+| Non-Functional Requirements | Complete ✓ |
+
+### Section-Specific Completeness
+
+**Success Criteria Measurability:** All measurable ✓ (with loose targets documented as intentional)
+**User Journeys Coverage:** Yes — covers primary (Carla, Rafael) and secondary (Marcos) users, plus edge case ✓
+**FRs Cover MVP Scope:** Yes — all 11 must-have capabilities have corresponding FRs ✓
+**NFRs Have Specific Criteria:** All except NFR1 (intentional) ✓
+
+### Frontmatter Completeness
+
+| Field | Status |
+|-------|--------|
+| stepsCompleted | Present ✓ (12 steps) |
+| classification | Present ✓ (projectType, domain, complexity, domainKnowledge, projectContext) |
+| inputDocuments | Present ✓ (7 documents) |
+| date | Present ✓ (2026-03-08) |
+
+**Frontmatter Completeness:** 4/4
+
+### Completeness Summary
+
+**Overall Completeness:** 100% (9/9 sections complete)
+
+**Critical Gaps:** 0
+**Minor Gaps:** 0
+
+**Severity:** Pass
+
+**Recommendation:** PRD is complete with all required sections and content present. Frontmatter properly populated. No template variables remaining.
+
+---
+
+## Validation Summary
+
+### Results by Check
+
+| # | Validation Check | Severity | Issues |
+|---|-----------------|----------|--------|
+| V-02 | Format Detection | BMAD Standard | 6/6 core sections |
+| V-03 | Information Density | **Pass** | 0 violations |
+| V-04 | Product Brief Coverage | **Pass** | ~98% coverage, 0 critical gaps |
+| V-05 | Measurability | **Pass** | 3 minor violations (1 FR + 2 NFR) |
+| V-06 | Traceability | **Pass** | 0 issues, chain intact |
+| V-07 | Implementation Leakage | **Pass** | 0 violations |
+| V-08 | Domain Compliance | **Pass** | 4/4 concerns addressed |
+| V-09 | Project-Type Compliance | **Pass** | 100% compliance |
+| V-10 | SMART Requirements | **Pass** | 90% score ≥4, avg 4.5/5.0 |
+| V-11 | Holistic Quality | **Good (4/5)** | 6.5/7 BMAD principles met |
+| V-12 | Completeness | **Pass** | 100% complete, 0 template vars |
+
+### Overall Verdict
+
+**PRD Status: APPROVED FOR DOWNSTREAM WORK**
+
+**Rating: 4/5 — Good**
+
+**Total Findings:** 3 minor, 0 critical
+
+### Action Items (Optional Refinements)
+
+| # | Finding | Severity | Recommendation |
+|---|---------|----------|----------------|
+| 1 | FR30 "claramente" subjective | Minor | Rewrite with concrete behavior |
+| 2 | NFR1 "razoável" unmeasurable | Minor/Intentional | Add loose guideline target |
+| 3 | No persona summary table | Minor | Add 3-line table before journeys |