Merge branch 'main' into fix/adversarial-review-formatting

This commit is contained in:
Michael Pursifull 2026-02-06 21:03:03 -06:00 committed by GitHub
commit a31e00921e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
8 changed files with 48 additions and 43 deletions

4
package-lock.json generated
View File

@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
{
"name": "bmad-method",
"version": "6.0.0-Beta.6",
"version": "6.0.0-Beta.7",
"lockfileVersion": 3,
"requires": true,
"packages": {
"": {
"name": "bmad-method",
"version": "6.0.0-Beta.6",
"version": "6.0.0-Beta.7",
"license": "MIT",
"dependencies": {
"@clack/core": "^1.0.0",

View File

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
{
"$schema": "https://json.schemastore.org/package.json",
"name": "bmad-method",
"version": "6.0.0-Beta.6",
"version": "6.0.0-Beta.7",
"description": "Breakthrough Method of Agile AI-driven Development",
"keywords": [
"agile",

View File

@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ Show the generated architectural patterns and present continue option:
#### If 'C' (Continue):
- Append the final content to the research document
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]`
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]`
- Load: `./step-05-implementation-research.md`
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Technical Research Step 4: Implementation Research
# Technical Research Step 5: Implementation Research
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
- ⚠️ Present [C] complete option after implementation research content generation
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Complete)
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]` before completing workflow
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]` before completing workflow
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to complete workflow until C is selected
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
- Focus on implementation approaches and technology adoption strategies
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
- This is the final step in the technical research workflow
- This step prepares for the final synthesis step
## YOUR TASK:
@ -149,10 +149,10 @@ _Source: [URL]_
[Success measurement framework]
```
### 6. Present Analysis and Complete Option
### 6. Present Analysis and Continue Option
Show the generated implementation research and present complete option:
"I've completed the **implementation research and technology adoption** analysis, finalizing our comprehensive technical research.
Show the generated implementation research and present continue option:
"I've completed the **implementation research and technology adoption** analysis for {{research_topic}}.
**Implementation Highlights:**
@ -162,23 +162,24 @@ Show the generated implementation research and present complete option:
- Team organization and skill requirements identified
- Cost optimization and resource management strategies provided
**This completes our technical research covering:**
**Technical research phases completed:**
- Technical overview and landscape analysis
- Architectural patterns and design decisions
- Implementation approaches and technology adoption
- Practical recommendations and implementation roadmap
- Step 1: Research scope confirmation
- Step 2: Technology stack analysis
- Step 3: Integration patterns analysis
- Step 4: Architectural patterns analysis
- Step 5: Implementation research (current step)
**Ready to complete the technical research report?**
[C] Complete Research - Save final document and conclude
**Ready to proceed to the final synthesis step?**
[C] Continue - Save this to document and proceed to synthesis
### 7. Handle Complete Selection
### 7. Handle Continue Selection
#### If 'C' (Complete Research):
#### If 'C' (Continue):
- Append the final content to the research document
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]`
- Complete the technical research workflow
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]`
- Load: `./step-06-research-synthesis.md`
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
@ -191,9 +192,9 @@ When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the research document usin
✅ Testing and deployment practices clearly documented
✅ Team organization and skill requirements mapped
✅ Cost optimization and risk mitigation strategies provided
✅ [C] complete option presented and handled correctly
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
Technical research workflow completed successfully
Proper routing to synthesis step (step-06)
## FAILURE MODES:
@ -202,8 +203,9 @@ When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the research document usin
❌ Missing critical technology adoption strategies
❌ Not providing practical implementation guidance
❌ Incomplete development workflows or operational practices analysis
❌ Not presenting completion option for research workflow
❌ Not presenting continue option to synthesis step
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
❌ Not routing to step-06-research-synthesis.md
**CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
**CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
@ -221,19 +223,11 @@ When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the research document usin
When 'C' is selected:
- All technical research steps completed
- Comprehensive technical research document generated
- All sections appended with source citations
- Technical research workflow status updated
- Final implementation recommendations provided to user
- Implementation research step completed
- Content appended to research document with source citations
- Frontmatter updated with stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
- Ready to proceed to final synthesis step
## NEXT STEPS:
## NEXT STEP:
Technical research workflow complete. User may:
- Use technical research to inform architecture decisions
- Conduct additional research on specific technologies
- Combine technical research with other research types for comprehensive insights
- Move forward with implementation based on technical insights
Congratulations on completing comprehensive technical research! 🎉
After user selects 'C', load `./step-06-research-synthesis.md` to produce the comprehensive technical research document with narrative introduction, detailed TOC, and executive summary.

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Technical Research Step 5: Technical Synthesis and Completion
# Technical Research Step 6: Technical Synthesis and Completion
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
- ⚠️ Present [C] complete option after synthesis content generation
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Complete)
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]` before completing workflow
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]` before completing workflow
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to complete workflow until C is selected
- 📚 GENERATE COMPLETE DOCUMENT STRUCTURE with intro, TOC, and summary
@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ _This comprehensive technical research document serves as an authoritative techn
#### If 'C' (Complete Research):
- Append the complete technical document to the research file
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]`
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]`
- Complete the technical research workflow
- Provide final technical document delivery confirmation

View File

@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ Merge all changes into `{diff_output}`.
### 2. Invoke Adversarial Review
With `{diff_output}` constructed, invoke the review task. If possible, use information asymmetry: run this step, and only it, in a separate subagent or process with read access to the project, but no context except the `{diff_output}`.
With `{diff_output}` constructed, load and follow the review task. If possible, use information asymmetry: load this step, and only it, in a separate subagent or process with read access to the project, but no context except the `{diff_output}`.
```xml
<invoke-task>Review {diff_output} using {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/review-adversarial-general.xml</invoke-task>

View File

@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ b) **HALT and wait for user selection.**
#### Adversarial Review [R] Process:
1. **Invoke Adversarial Review Task**:
> With `{finalFile}` constructed, invoke the review task. If possible, use information asymmetry: run this task, and only it, in a separate subagent or process with read access to the project, but no context except the `{finalFile}`.
> With `{finalFile}` constructed, load and follow the review task. If possible, use information asymmetry: load this task, and only it, in a separate subagent or process with read access to the project, but no context except the `{finalFile}`.
<invoke-task>Review {finalFile} using {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/review-adversarial-general.xml</invoke-task>
> **Platform fallback:** If task invocation not available, load the task file and follow its instructions inline, passing `{finalFile}` as the content.
> The task should: review `{finalFile}` and return a list of findings.

View File

@ -142,6 +142,17 @@ Thank you for using BMAD Party Mode for collaborative multi-agent discussions!"
- Express genuine appreciation for user's participation and engagement
- Leave user with encouragement for future collaborative sessions
## RETURN PROTOCOL:
If this workflow was invoked from within a parent workflow:
1. Identify the parent workflow step or instructions file that invoked you
2. Re-read that file now to restore context
3. Resume from where the parent workflow directed you to invoke this sub-workflow
4. Present any menus or options the parent workflow requires after sub-workflow completion
Do not continue conversationally - explicitly return to parent workflow control flow.
## WORKFLOW COMPLETION:
After farewell sequence and final closure: