Revert "fix(integrations): claude perf improvement WIP"
This reverts commit a3b14b4b5c.
This commit is contained in:
Basit Mustafa
parent
5fbddac36b
commit
8860dfe04e
|
|
@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
|
|||
# cite-sources
|
||||
|
||||
Ensure proper source attribution for all data and claims in analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
## Citation Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Data Citations
|
||||
For every quantitative claim, include:
|
||||
- **Source**: File name and line number (e.g., market-sizes.csv:line 3)
|
||||
- **Date**: When data was collected/published
|
||||
- **Context**: Methodology or scope limitations
|
||||
|
||||
### Format Examples
|
||||
```
|
||||
Market Size: $7.8B (Source: market-sizes.csv:line 2, Grand View Research 2023)
|
||||
Growth Rate: 24.3% CAGR (Source: market-sizes.csv:line 3, TechNavio 2023)
|
||||
Competitor Users: 200M users (Source: competitive-benchmarks.csv:line 2, Atlassian public filings)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Web Sources
|
||||
When referencing external information:
|
||||
- Include full URL when possible
|
||||
- Note access date
|
||||
- Specify page section if applicable
|
||||
|
||||
### Internal BMAD Sources
|
||||
- Template usage: "Using prd-tmpl.yaml framework"
|
||||
- Task reference: "Following create-doc.md methodology"
|
||||
- Data file: "Analysis based on bmad-kb.md section 2.3"
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation Checklist
|
||||
- [ ] Every statistic has source attribution
|
||||
- [ ] File references include line numbers
|
||||
- [ ] External sources include dates
|
||||
- [ ] Claims are traceable to evidence
|
||||
- [ ] Sources are credible and recent
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation
|
||||
Add citations as you work, not as an afterthought. Use this format consistently throughout all analysis deliverables.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
|
|||
# create-scorecard
|
||||
|
||||
Generate BMAD Opportunity Scorecard for market opportunities or feature ideas.
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Framework
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Opportunity Definition**
|
||||
- Define the specific opportunity or feature
|
||||
- Establish target customer segment
|
||||
- Clarify success metrics
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Market Analysis Scoring (1-5 scale)**
|
||||
- Market Size: Total addressable market potential
|
||||
- Growth Rate: Market expansion velocity
|
||||
- Competition: Competitive density and strength
|
||||
- Timing: Market readiness and external factors
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Implementation Feasibility (1-5 scale)**
|
||||
- Technical Complexity: Development difficulty
|
||||
- Resource Requirements: Team and budget needs
|
||||
- Time to Market: Speed of delivery
|
||||
- Risk Level: Technical and market risks
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Strategic Fit (1-5 scale)**
|
||||
- Business Model Alignment: Revenue model fit
|
||||
- Core Competency Match: Team capability alignment
|
||||
- Competitive Advantage: Defensibility potential
|
||||
- Customer Value: Benefit magnitude
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Generate Scorecard Output**
|
||||
```
|
||||
OPPORTUNITY SCORECARD
|
||||
Opportunity: [Name]
|
||||
|
||||
MARKET ATTRACTIVENESS (Total: /20)
|
||||
- Market Size: [X]/5
|
||||
- Growth Rate: [X]/5
|
||||
- Competition: [X]/5
|
||||
- Timing: [X]/5
|
||||
|
||||
IMPLEMENTATION FEASIBILITY (Total: /20)
|
||||
- Technical Complexity: [X]/5
|
||||
- Resource Requirements: [X]/5
|
||||
- Time to Market: [X]/5
|
||||
- Risk Level: [X]/5
|
||||
|
||||
STRATEGIC FIT (Total: /20)
|
||||
- Business Model Alignment: [X]/5
|
||||
- Core Competency Match: [X]/5
|
||||
- Competitive Advantage: [X]/5
|
||||
- Customer Value: [X]/5
|
||||
|
||||
OVERALL SCORE: [X]/60
|
||||
RECOMMENDATION: [Go/No-Go/Investigate Further]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Data Sources
|
||||
- Market data from bmad-core/data/market-sizes.csv
|
||||
- Competitive intelligence from competitive-benchmarks.csv
|
||||
- User-provided opportunity details
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation Criteria
|
||||
- All scores justified with evidence
|
||||
- Recommendations align with scoring
|
||||
- Clear next steps provided
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
|
|||
# run-gap-matrix
|
||||
|
||||
Execute competitive gap matrix analysis using BMAD methodology.
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Initialize Framework**
|
||||
- Load competitive-benchmarks.csv data
|
||||
- Define evaluation criteria (features, pricing, market position)
|
||||
- Set up scoring matrix (1-5 scale per criterion)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Gather Competitive Intelligence**
|
||||
- Use market research data and user inputs
|
||||
- Score each competitor on defined criteria
|
||||
- Identify feature gaps and positioning opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Generate Gap Matrix**
|
||||
- Create visual/tabular representation
|
||||
- Highlight underserved market segments
|
||||
- Prioritize gaps by market size and difficulty
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Output Deliverable**
|
||||
- Structured gap analysis with scoring
|
||||
- Opportunity recommendations
|
||||
- Strategic positioning insights
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Data Sources
|
||||
- bmad-core/data/competitive-benchmarks.csv
|
||||
- bmad-core/data/market-sizes.csv
|
||||
- User-provided competitive intelligence
|
||||
|
||||
## Template Usage
|
||||
Use competitor-analysis-tmpl.yaml as base structure for output formatting.
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation
|
||||
Ensure all major competitors are scored, gaps are quantified, and recommendations are actionable.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
|
|||
# self-reflect
|
||||
|
||||
Post-analysis reflection and continuous improvement task.
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
Critically evaluate completed analysis to improve quality and identify gaps.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reflection Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Completeness Check
|
||||
- Did I address all aspects of the original request?
|
||||
- Are there missing perspectives or stakeholder views?
|
||||
- What assumptions did I make that should be validated?
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Evidence Quality Assessment
|
||||
- How strong is the evidence supporting my conclusions?
|
||||
- Where did I rely on incomplete or outdated data?
|
||||
- What additional data would strengthen the analysis?
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Methodology Review
|
||||
- Did I follow BMAD methodology consistently?
|
||||
- Were my hypotheses properly tested and validated?
|
||||
- Did I use appropriate analytical frameworks?
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Actionability Evaluation
|
||||
- Are my recommendations specific and implementable?
|
||||
- Do I provide clear next steps and success metrics?
|
||||
- Have I considered implementation challenges?
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Bias and Blind Spot Check
|
||||
- What biases might have influenced my analysis?
|
||||
- What alternative interpretations did I not consider?
|
||||
- Where might domain experts disagree with my conclusions?
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
```
|
||||
REFLECTION SUMMARY
|
||||
Analysis: [Title/Topic]
|
||||
Completed: [Date]
|
||||
|
||||
STRENGTHS IDENTIFIED:
|
||||
- [Strength 1]
|
||||
- [Strength 2]
|
||||
|
||||
GAPS AND IMPROVEMENTS:
|
||||
- [Gap 1] → [Improvement Action]
|
||||
- [Gap 2] → [Improvement Action]
|
||||
|
||||
FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS:
|
||||
- [Question requiring further research]
|
||||
- [Validation needed]
|
||||
|
||||
LESSONS LEARNED:
|
||||
- [Insight for future analyses]
|
||||
|
||||
CONFIDENCE LEVEL: [High/Medium/Low] in conclusions
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with Memory
|
||||
Store key learnings in memory file for future reference and pattern recognition.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage Trigger
|
||||
Execute this task after completing any major analysis, scorecard, or strategic deliverable.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,158 +0,0 @@
|
|||
# BMAD Claude Integration - Implementation Summary
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎯 Achievement Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Successfully transformed BMAD-Method into high-quality Claude Code subagents with **predicted 83-90% evaluation scores** (up from 68% baseline).
|
||||
|
||||
## ✅ Completed Oracle-Directed Improvements
|
||||
|
||||
### P0 Tasks (Critical - 100% Complete)
|
||||
- [x] **Auto-inject full BMAD artifact lists**: Real files from bmad-core now populate all agents
|
||||
- [x] **BMAD artifact command group**: 6 specialized commands for each agent
|
||||
- [x] **Memory primer**: Context persistence instructions for all agents
|
||||
- [x] **Hypothesis-driven analysis**: 4-step framework embedded in analyst persona
|
||||
|
||||
### P1 Tasks (High Impact - 100% Complete)
|
||||
- [x] **Shared handoff scratchpad**: `.claude/handoff/current.md` for cross-agent workflows
|
||||
- [x] **Quantitative data sourcing**: Added market-sizes.csv and competitive-benchmarks.csv
|
||||
- [x] **Template rendering helper**: Command infrastructure for artifact generation
|
||||
- [x] **Security & domain cheat-sheets**: security-patterns.md and fintech-compliance.md
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Enhancements (90%+ Score Targets)
|
||||
- [x] **Executable task framework**: run-gap-matrix.md, create-scorecard.md
|
||||
- [x] **Source attribution system**: cite-sources.md for data credibility
|
||||
- [x] **Self-reflection capability**: self-reflect.md for continuous improvement
|
||||
- [x] **Enhanced command surface**: 6 BMAD commands with task file references
|
||||
|
||||
## 📊 Before vs After Comparison
|
||||
|
||||
| Evaluation Criteria | Before (68%) | After (Predicted 83-90%) | Improvement |
|
||||
|---------------------|--------------|---------------------------|-------------|
|
||||
| Subagent Persona | 4/5 | 4/5 | ✓ Maintained |
|
||||
| BMAD Integration | 2/5 | 4-5/5 | +2-3 points |
|
||||
| Analytical Expertise | 2/5 | 5/5 | +3 points |
|
||||
| Response Structure | 4/5 | 4/5 | ✓ Maintained |
|
||||
| User Engagement | 4/5 | 4/5 | ✓ Maintained |
|
||||
| Quantitative Analysis | 2/5 | 4/5 | +2 points |
|
||||
| Memory/Advanced Features | 2/5 | 3-4/5 | +1-2 points |
|
||||
| Domain Expertise | 2/5 | 3-4/5 | +1-2 points |
|
||||
|
||||
## 🏗️ Technical Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### Generated Structure
|
||||
```
|
||||
.claude/
|
||||
├── agents/ # 6 specialized subagents
|
||||
│ ├── analyst.md # Mary - Market research, gap analysis
|
||||
│ ├── architect.md # Winston - System design
|
||||
│ ├── dev.md # James - Implementation
|
||||
│ ├── pm.md # John - Project management
|
||||
│ ├── qa.md # Quinn - Quality assurance
|
||||
│ └── sm.md # Bob - Scrum facilitation
|
||||
├── memory/ # Context persistence per agent
|
||||
└── handoff/ # Cross-agent collaboration
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Enhanced Data Sources
|
||||
```
|
||||
bmad-core/data/
|
||||
├── market-sizes.csv # Quantitative market data
|
||||
├── competitive-benchmarks.csv # Competitor intelligence
|
||||
├── security-patterns.md # Security best practices
|
||||
├── fintech-compliance.md # Regulatory guidelines
|
||||
└── [existing BMAD data]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### New Task Framework
|
||||
```
|
||||
bmad-core/tasks/
|
||||
├── run-gap-matrix.md # Competitive analysis execution
|
||||
├── create-scorecard.md # Opportunity scoring methodology
|
||||
├── cite-sources.md # Source attribution system
|
||||
├── self-reflect.md # Post-analysis improvement
|
||||
└── [existing BMAD tasks]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎭 Agent Capabilities Enhancement
|
||||
|
||||
### All Agents Now Include:
|
||||
- **Real BMAD Artifacts**: 17 tasks, 12 templates, 6 data files
|
||||
- **6 BMAD Commands**: use-template, run-gap-matrix, create-scorecard, render-template, cite-sources, self-reflect
|
||||
- **Memory Management**: Persistent context across sessions
|
||||
- **Cross-Agent Handoff**: Structured collaboration workflows
|
||||
- **Source Attribution**: Data credibility and citation requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Analyst-Specific Enhancements:
|
||||
- **Hypothesis-Driven Framework**: 4-step analytical methodology
|
||||
- **Market Data Access**: Real CSV data with growth rates and sizing
|
||||
- **Gap Matrix Execution**: Structured competitive analysis
|
||||
- **Opportunity Scoring**: BMAD scorecard methodology
|
||||
- **Reflection Capability**: Post-analysis improvement loops
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧪 Testing & Validation
|
||||
|
||||
### Automated Validation
|
||||
- ✅ All agent files generate successfully
|
||||
- ✅ YAML frontmatter validates correctly
|
||||
- ✅ Real BMAD artifacts properly injected
|
||||
- ✅ Tool permissions correctly assigned
|
||||
|
||||
### Manual Testing Framework
|
||||
- 📋 Test scenarios for each agent
|
||||
- 🤖 o3 evaluation criteria established
|
||||
- 📊 Scoring rubric (5-point scale per criterion)
|
||||
- 📈 Target: 85%+ for production readiness
|
||||
|
||||
### Usage Commands
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Build agents
|
||||
npm run build:claude
|
||||
|
||||
# Validate setup
|
||||
npm run test:claude
|
||||
|
||||
# Start Claude Code
|
||||
claude
|
||||
|
||||
# Test analyst
|
||||
"Use the analyst subagent to research AI project management tools"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚀 Predicted Performance Improvements
|
||||
|
||||
Based on Oracle's detailed analysis:
|
||||
|
||||
### Expected Score Range: **83-90%**
|
||||
- **P0 + P1 Implementation**: 83-86% (current state)
|
||||
- **With Remaining Refinements**: 90-92% (production ready)
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Success Evidence:
|
||||
1. **Real Artifact Integration**: Templates and tasks now executable
|
||||
2. **Methodology Depth**: Hypothesis-driven analysis embedded
|
||||
3. **Data-Driven Analysis**: Quantitative sources with citations
|
||||
4. **Advanced Features**: Memory, handoffs, reflection loops
|
||||
5. **Quality Assurance**: Self-validation and improvement cycles
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎯 Production Readiness Status
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Ready for Production Use:
|
||||
- Core agent functionality complete
|
||||
- BMAD methodology properly integrated
|
||||
- Quality evaluation framework established
|
||||
- Documentation and testing comprehensive
|
||||
|
||||
### 🔄 Continuous Improvement Pipeline:
|
||||
- Monitor agent performance in real usage
|
||||
- Collect feedback and iterate on prompts
|
||||
- Expand data sources and templates
|
||||
- Enhance cross-agent collaboration patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## 📖 Next Steps for Users
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Immediate Use**: Run `npm run test:claude` and start testing
|
||||
2. **Manual Validation**: Test each agent with provided scenarios
|
||||
3. **o3 Evaluation**: Use Oracle for detailed performance assessment
|
||||
4. **Iteration**: Apply feedback to further improve agent quality
|
||||
5. **Production Deployment**: Begin using agents for real BMAD workflows
|
||||
|
||||
This implementation represents a successful transformation of BMAD-Method into Claude Code's subagent system, maintaining methodology integrity while achieving significant quality improvements through Oracle-guided enhancements.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
|
|||
# BMAD-Method Claude Code Integration - ALPHA AT BEST!
|
||||
|
||||
PLEASE OPEN ISSUES AGAINST THE [BMAD-AT-CODE](https://github.com/24601/BMAD-AT-CLAUDE/issues) REPO!
|
||||
# BMAD-Method Claude Code Integration
|
||||
|
||||
This directory contains the integration layer that ports BMAD-Method agents to Claude Code's subagent system.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -29,11 +29,9 @@ memory: ./.claude/memory/{{agent.id}}.md
|
|||
|
||||
### BMAD Commands
|
||||
- **use-template <file>**: Read and embed a BMAD template from templates/
|
||||
- **run-gap-matrix**: Execute competitive Gap Matrix analysis (see bmad-core/tasks/run-gap-matrix.md)
|
||||
- **create-scorecard**: Generate BMAD Opportunity Scorecard (see bmad-core/tasks/create-scorecard.md)
|
||||
- **run-gap-matrix**: Guide user through competitive Gap Matrix analysis
|
||||
- **create-scorecard**: Produce Opportunity Scorecard using BMAD template
|
||||
- **render-template <templatePath>**: Read template, replace placeholders, output final artifact
|
||||
- **cite-sources**: Ensure proper attribution for all data and claims (see bmad-core/tasks/cite-sources.md)
|
||||
- **self-reflect**: Post-analysis reflection and improvement (see bmad-core/tasks/self-reflect.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Working Mode
|
||||
You are {{agent.name}}, a {{agent.title}} operating within the BMAD-Method framework.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue