docs: spell out acronyms in TEA Lite quickstart
- MCP → Model Context Protocol - E2E → End-to-end (also fix missing article) - CI/CD → Continuous integration/continuous deployment - ATDD → Acceptance Test-Driven Development - TDD → Test-Driven Development - NFR → non-functional requirements - Remove inaccurate CRUD reference Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c98849ea80
commit
7d39a2bbdd
|
|
@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ When prompted:
|
||||||
- **Planning artifacts folder:** Keep default
|
- **Planning artifacts folder:** Keep default
|
||||||
- **Implementation artifacts folder:** Keep default
|
- **Implementation artifacts folder:** Keep default
|
||||||
- **Project knowledge folder:** Keep default
|
- **Project knowledge folder:** Keep default
|
||||||
- **Enable TEA Playwright MCP enhancements?** Choose "No" for now (we'll explore this later)
|
- **Enable TEA Playwright Model Context Protocol (MCP) enhancements?** Choose "No" for now (we'll explore this later)
|
||||||
- **Using playwright-utils?** Choose "No" for now (we'll explore this later)
|
- **Using playwright-utils?** Choose "No" for now (we'll explore this later)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
BMad is now installed! You'll see a `_bmad/` folder in your project.
|
BMad is now installed! You'll see a `_bmad/` folder in your project.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -90,9 +90,9 @@ A: "We're testing a React web application (TodoMVC)"
|
||||||
A: "Playwright"
|
A: "Playwright"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Q: Testing scope?**
|
**Q: Testing scope?**
|
||||||
A: "E2E testing for web application"
|
A: "End-to-end (E2E) testing for a web application"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Q: CI/CD platform?**
|
**Q: Continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) platform?**
|
||||||
A: "GitHub Actions" (or your preference)
|
A: "GitHub Actions" (or your preference)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
TEA will generate:
|
TEA will generate:
|
||||||
|
|
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ In your chat with TEA, run:
|
||||||
A: "Epic-level - I want to test TodoMVC's basic functionality"
|
A: "Epic-level - I want to test TodoMVC's basic functionality"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Q: What feature are you testing?**
|
**Q: What feature are you testing?**
|
||||||
A: "TodoMVC's core CRUD operations - creating, completing, and deleting todos"
|
A: "TodoMVC's core operations - creating, completing, and deleting todos"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Q: Any specific risks or concerns?**
|
**Q: Any specific risks or concerns?**
|
||||||
A: "We want to ensure the filter buttons (All, Active, Completed) work correctly"
|
A: "We want to ensure the filter buttons (All, Active, Completed) work correctly"
|
||||||
|
|
@ -358,8 +358,8 @@ This tutorial used `*automate` to generate tests for **existing features** (test
|
||||||
- Want to add test coverage
|
- Want to add test coverage
|
||||||
- Tests should pass on first run
|
- Tests should pass on first run
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**When to use `*atdd`:**
|
**When to use `*atdd` (Acceptance Test-Driven Development):**
|
||||||
- Feature doesn't exist yet (TDD workflow)
|
- Feature doesn't exist yet (Test-Driven Development workflow)
|
||||||
- Want failing tests BEFORE implementation
|
- Want failing tests BEFORE implementation
|
||||||
- Following red → green → refactor cycle
|
- Following red → green → refactor cycle
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ See [TEA Overview](/docs/explanation/features/tea-overview.md) for engagement mo
|
||||||
### Go Full TEA Integrated
|
### Go Full TEA Integrated
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Want the complete quality operating model? Try TEA Integrated with BMad Method:
|
Want the complete quality operating model? Try TEA Integrated with BMad Method:
|
||||||
- Phase 2: Planning with NFR assessment
|
- Phase 2: Planning with non-functional requirements (NFR) assessment
|
||||||
- Phase 3: Architecture testability review
|
- Phase 3: Architecture testability review
|
||||||
- Phase 4: Per-epic test design → ATDD → automate
|
- Phase 4: Per-epic test design → ATDD → automate
|
||||||
- Release Gate: Coverage traceability and gate decisions
|
- Release Gate: Coverage traceability and gate decisions
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue