Merge branch 'main' into feat/external-agent-code-review

.coderabbit.yaml

@@ -4,9 +4,10 @@ language: "en-US"
 early_access: true
 reviews:
   profile: chill
-  high_level_summary: true
+  high_level_summary: false # don't post summary until explicitly invoked
   request_changes_workflow: false
   review_status: false
+  commit_status: false # don't set commit status until explicitly invoked
   collapse_walkthrough: false
   poem: false
   auto_review:
@@ -33,4 +34,7 @@ reviews:
         Flag any process.exit() without error message.
 chat:
   auto_reply: true # Response to mentions in comments, a la @coderabbit review
+issue_enrichment:
+  auto_enrich:
+    enabled: false # don't auto-comment on issues
 

package-lock.json

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 {
   "name": "bmad-method",
-  "version": "6.0.0-alpha.15",
+  "version": "6.0.0-alpha.16",
   "lockfileVersion": 3,
   "requires": true,
   "packages": {
     "": {
       "name": "bmad-method",
-      "version": "6.0.0-alpha.15",
+      "version": "6.0.0-alpha.16",
       "license": "MIT",
       "dependencies": {
         "@kayvan/markdown-tree-parser": "^1.6.1",

src/modules/bmgd/workflows/4-production/code-review/instructions.md

@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ Review was saved to story file, but sprint-status.yaml may be out of sync.
       <action>All action items are included in the standalone review report</action>
       <ask if="action items exist">Would you like me to create tracking items for these action items? (backlog/tasks)</ask>
       <action if="user confirms">
-        If {{backlog_file}} does not exist, copy {installed_path}/backlog_template.md to {{backlog_file}} location.
+        If {{backlog_file}} does not exist, copy {installed_path}/backlog-template.md to {{backlog_file}} location.
         Append a row per action item with Date={{date}}, Story="Ad-Hoc Review", Epic="N/A", Type, Severity, Owner (or "TBD"), Status="Open", Notes with file refs and context.
       </action>
     </check>
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ Review was saved to story file, but sprint-status.yaml may be out of sync.
         Append under the story's "Tasks / Subtasks" a new subsection titled "Review Follow-ups (AI)", adding each item as an unchecked checkbox in imperative form, prefixed with "[AI-Review]" and severity. Example: "- [ ] [AI-Review][High] Add input validation on server route /api/x (AC #2)".
       </action>
       <action>
-        If {{backlog_file}} does not exist, copy {installed_path}/backlog_template.md to {{backlog_file}} location.
+        If {{backlog_file}} does not exist, copy {installed_path}/backlog-template.md to {{backlog_file}} location.
         Append a row per action item with Date={{date}}, Story={{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}, Epic={{epic_num}}, Type, Severity, Owner (or "TBD"), Status="Open", Notes with short context and file refs.
       </action>
       <action>

src/modules/bmm/agents/dev.agent.yaml

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ agent:
 
   critical_actions:
     - "READ the entire story file BEFORE any implementation - tasks/subtasks sequence is your authoritative implementation guide"
-    - "Load project_context.md if available for coding standards only - never let it override story requirements"
+    - "Load project-context.md if available for coding standards only - never let it override story requirements"
     - "Execute tasks/subtasks IN ORDER as written in story file - no skipping, no reordering, no doing what you want"
     - "For each task/subtask: follow red-green-refactor cycle - write failing test first, then implementation"
     - "Mark task/subtask [x] ONLY when both implementation AND tests are complete and passing"

src/modules/bmm/docs/faq.md

@@ -199,24 +199,11 @@ PRDs are for Level 2-4 projects with multiple features requiring product-level c
 
 ### Q: How do I mark a story as done?
 
-**A:** You have two options:
+**A:** After dev-story completes and code-review passes:
 
-**Option 1: Use story-done workflow (Recommended)**
+1. Open `sprint-status.yaml` (created by sprint-planning)
-
+2. Change the story status from `review` to `done`
-1. Load SM agent
+3. Save the file
-2. Run `story-done` workflow
-3. Workflow automatically updates `sprint-status.yaml` (created by sprint-planning at Phase 4 start)
-4. Moves story from current status → `DONE`
-5. Advances the story queue
-
-**Option 2: Manual update**
-
-1. After dev-story completes and code-review passes
-2. Open `sprint-status.yaml` (created by sprint-planning)
-3. Change the story status from `review` to `done`
-4. Save the file
-
-The story-done workflow is faster and ensures proper status file updates.
 
 ### Q: Can I work on multiple stories at once?
 

src/modules/bmm/docs/images/workflow-method-greenfield.excalidraw

@@ -2934,7 +2934,7 @@
         "gap": 1
       },
       "endBinding": {
-        "elementId": "proc-story-done",
+        "elementId": "proc-code-review",
         "focus": 0.04241833499478815,
         "gap": 1.3466869862454587
       },
@@ -3189,7 +3189,7 @@
       "lineHeight": 1.25
     },
     {
-      "id": "proc-story-done",
+      "id": "proc-code-review",
       "type": "rectangle",
       "x": 1169.3991588878014,
       "y": 947.2529662369525,
@@ -3207,12 +3207,12 @@
         "value": 8
       },
       "groupIds": [
-        "proc-story-done-group"
+        "proc-code-review-group"
       ],
       "boundElements": [
         {
           "type": "text",
-          "id": "proc-story-done-text"
+          "id": "proc-code-review-text"
         },
         {
           "type": "arrow",
@@ -3235,7 +3235,7 @@
       "link": null
     },
     {
-      "id": "proc-story-done-text",
+      "id": "proc-code-review-text",
       "type": "text",
       "x": 1187.9272045420983,
       "y": 972.2529662369525,
@@ -3249,14 +3249,14 @@
       "roughness": 0,
       "opacity": 100,
       "groupIds": [
-        "proc-story-done-group"
+        "proc-code-review-group"
       ],
       "fontSize": 16,
       "fontFamily": 1,
       "text": "Code Review\n<<use different\nLLM>>",
       "textAlign": "center",
       "verticalAlign": "middle",
-      "containerId": "proc-story-done",
+      "containerId": "proc-code-review",
       "locked": false,
       "version": 502,
       "versionNonce": 1242095014,
@@ -3289,7 +3289,7 @@
       "opacity": 100,
       "groupIds": [],
       "startBinding": {
-        "elementId": "proc-story-done",
+        "elementId": "proc-code-review",
         "focus": 0.014488632877232727,
         "gap": 8.284295421831303
       },

src/modules/bmm/docs/quick-spec-flow.md

@@ -377,12 +377,6 @@ Checks:
 
 Quick Spec Flow works seamlessly with all Phase 4 implementation workflows:
 
-### story-context (SM Agent)
-
-- ✅ Recognizes tech-spec.md as authoritative source
-- ✅ Extracts context from tech-spec (replaces PRD)
-- ✅ Generates XML context for complex scenarios
-
 ### create-story (SM Agent)
 
 - ✅ Can work with tech-spec.md instead of PRD
@@ -529,10 +523,6 @@ Quick Spec Flow is **fully standalone**:
 
 **A:** No problem! You can always transition to BMad Method by running workflow-init and create-prd. Your tech-spec becomes input for the PRD.
 
-### Q: Do I need story-context for every story?
-
-**A:** Usually no! Tech-spec is comprehensive enough for most Quick Flow projects. Only use story-context for complex edge cases.
-
 ### Q: Can I skip validation?
 
 **A:** No, validation always runs automatically. But it's fast and catches issues early!
@@ -564,15 +554,11 @@ Starter templates save hours of setup time. Let Quick Spec Flow find the best on
 
 When validation runs, read the scores. They tell you if your spec is production-ready.
 
-### 5. **Story Context is Optional**
+### 5. **Keep Single Changes Truly Atomic**
-
-For single changes, try going directly to dev-story first. Only add story-context if you hit complexity.
-
-### 6. **Keep Single Changes Truly Atomic**
 
 If your "single change" needs 3+ files, it might be a multi-story feature. Let the workflow guide you.
 
-### 7. **Validate Story Sequence for Multi-Story Features**
+### 6. **Validate Story Sequence for Multi-Story Features**
 
 When you get multiple stories, check the dependency validation output. Proper sequence matters!
 

src/modules/bmm/docs/test-architecture.md

@@ -26,14 +26,17 @@ graph TB
     subgraph Phase3["<b>Phase 3: SOLUTIONING</b>"]
         Architecture["<b>Architect: *architecture</b>"]
         EpicsStories["<b>PM/Architect: *create-epics-and-stories</b>"]
+        TestDesignSys["<b>TEA: *test-design (system-level)</b>"]
         Framework["<b>TEA: *framework</b>"]
         CI["<b>TEA: *ci</b>"]
         GateCheck["<b>Architect: *implementation-readiness</b>"]
         Architecture --> EpicsStories
+        Architecture --> TestDesignSys
+        TestDesignSys --> Framework
         EpicsStories --> Framework
         Framework --> CI
         CI --> GateCheck
-        Phase3Note["<b>Epics created AFTER architecture,</b><br/><b>then test infrastructure setup</b>"]
+        Phase3Note["<b>Epics created AFTER architecture,</b><br/><b>then system-level test design and test infrastructure setup</b>"]
         EpicsStories -.-> Phase3Note
     end
 
@@ -93,12 +96,17 @@ graph TB
 - **Documentation** (Optional for brownfield): Prerequisite using `*document-project`
 - **Phase 1** (Optional): Discovery/Analysis (`*brainstorm`, `*research`, `*product-brief`)
 - **Phase 2** (Required): Planning (`*prd` creates PRD with FRs/NFRs)
-- **Phase 3** (Track-dependent): Solutioning (`*architecture` → `*create-epics-and-stories` → TEA: `*framework`, `*ci` → `*implementation-readiness`)
+- **Phase 3** (Track-dependent): Solutioning (`*architecture` → `*test-design` (system-level) → `*create-epics-and-stories` → TEA: `*framework`, `*ci` → `*implementation-readiness`)
 - **Phase 4** (Required): Implementation (`*sprint-planning` → per-epic: `*test-design` → per-story: dev workflows)
 
-**TEA workflows:** `*framework` and `*ci` run once in Phase 3 after architecture. `*test-design` runs per-epic in Phase 4. Output: `test-design-epic-N.md`.
+**TEA workflows:** `*framework` and `*ci` run once in Phase 3 after architecture. `*test-design` is **dual-mode**:
 
-Quick Flow track skips Phase 1 and 3. BMad Method and Enterprise use all phases based on project needs.
+- **System-level (Phase 3):** Run immediately after architecture/ADR drafting to produce `test-design-system.md` (testability review, ADR → test mapping, Architecturally Significant Requirements (ASRs), environment needs). Feeds the implementation-readiness gate.
+- **Epic-level (Phase 4):** Run per-epic to produce `test-design-epic-N.md` (risk, priorities, coverage plan).
+
+Quick Flow track skips Phases 1 and 3.
+BMad Method and Enterprise use all phases based on project needs.
+When an ADR or architecture draft is produced, run `*test-design` in **system-level** mode before the implementation-readiness gate. This ensures the ADR has an attached testability review and ADR → test mapping. Keep the test-design updated if ADRs change.
 
 ### Why TEA is Different from Other BMM Agents
 

src/modules/bmm/docs/troubleshooting.md

@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ workflow-init asks: "Is this work in progress or previous effort?"
 2. Verify agent has workflow:
    - PM agent: prd, tech-spec
    - Architect agent: create-architecture, validate-architecture
-   - SM agent: sprint-planning, create-story, story-context
+   - SM agent: sprint-planning, create-story
 3. Try menu number instead of name
 4. Check you're using correct agent for workflow
 
@@ -219,23 +219,6 @@ workflow-init asks: "Is this work in progress or previous effort?"
 3. **Run in Phase 4 only** - Ensure Phase 2/3 complete first
 4. **Check file paths** - Epic files should be in correct output folder
 
-### Problem: story-context generates empty or wrong context
-
-**Symptoms:**
-
-- Context file created but has no useful content
-- Context doesn't reference existing code
-- Missing technical guidance
-
-**Solution:**
-
-1. **Run epic-tech-context first** - story-context builds on epic context
-2. **Check story file exists** - Verify story was created by create-story
-3. **For brownfield**:
-   - Ensure document-project was run
-   - Verify docs/index.md exists with codebase context
-4. **Try regenerating** - Sometimes needs fresh attempt with more specific story details
-
 ---
 
 ## Context and Documentation Issues
@@ -362,7 +345,7 @@ For most brownfield projects, **Deep scan is sufficient**.
 1. **For brownfield**:
    - Ensure document-project captured existing architecture
    - Review architecture docs before implementing
-2. **Check story-context** - Should document integration points
+2. **Check story file** - Should document integration points
 3. **In tech-spec/architecture** - Explicitly document:
    - Which existing modules to modify
    - What APIs/services to integrate with
@@ -384,7 +367,7 @@ For most brownfield projects, **Deep scan is sufficient**.
    - Should detect existing patterns
    - Asks for confirmation before proceeding
 2. **Review documentation** - Ensure document-project captured patterns
-3. **Use story-context** - Injects pattern guidance per story
+3. **Use comprehensive story files** - Include pattern guidance in story
 4. **Add to code-review checklist**:
    - Pattern adherence
    - Convention consistency
@@ -459,9 +442,7 @@ To change locations, edit config.yaml then re-run workflows.
    ```
 2. **Some workflows auto-update**:
    - sprint-planning creates file
-   - epic-tech-context changes epic to "contexted"
+   - create-story changes story to "ready-for-dev"
-   - create-story changes story to "drafted"
-   - story-context changes to "ready-for-dev"
    - dev-story may auto-update (check workflow)
 3. **Re-run sprint-planning** to resync if needed
 
@@ -657,8 +638,8 @@ If your issue isn't covered here:
 
 ### "Context generation failed"
 
-**Cause:** Missing prerequisites (epic context, story file, or docs)
+**Cause:** Missing prerequisites (story file or docs)
-**Fix:** Verify epic-tech-context run, story file exists, docs present
+**Fix:** Verify story file exists, docs present
 
 ---
 

src/modules/bmm/docs/workflows-implementation.md

@@ -152,10 +152,9 @@ Dependencies: Story 1.2 (DONE) ✅
 **Recommendation:** Run `create-story` to generate Story 1.3
 
 After create-story:
-1. Run story-context
+1. Run dev-story
-2. Run dev-story
+2. Run code-review
-3. Run code-review
+3. Update sprint-status.yaml to mark story done
-4. Run story-done
 ```
 
 See: [workflow-status instructions](../workflows/workflow-status/instructions.md)

src/modules/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/prd/workflow.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: create-prd
-description: Creates a comprehensive PRDs through collaborative step-by-step discovery between two product managers working as peers.
+description: Creates a comprehensive PRD through collaborative step-by-step discovery between two product managers working as peers.
 main_config: '{project-root}/.bmad/bmm/config.yaml'
 web_bundle: true
 ---

src/modules/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/architecture/steps/step-01-init.md

@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ Discover and load context documents using smart discovery:
 
 **Project Context Rules (Critical for AI Agents):**
 
-1. Check for project context file: `**/project_context.md`
+1. Check for project context file: `**/project-context.md`
 2. If exists: Load COMPLETE file contents - this contains critical rules for AI agents
 3. Add to frontmatter `hasProjectContext: true` and track file path
 4. Report to user: "Found existing project context with {number_of_rules} agent rules"

src/modules/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md

@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ Your architecture will ensure consistent, high-quality implementation across all
 
 **💡 Optional Enhancement: Project Context File**
 
-Would you like to create a `project_context.md` file? This is a concise, optimized guide for AI agents that captures:
+Would you like to create a `project-context.md` file? This is a concise, optimized guide for AI agents that captures:
 
 - Critical language and framework rules they might miss
 - Specific patterns and conventions for your project
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ This will help ensure consistent implementation by capturing:
 - Testing and quality standards
 - Anti-patterns to avoid
 
-The workflow will collaborate with you to create an optimized `project_context.md` file that AI agents will read before implementing any code."
+The workflow will collaborate with you to create an optimized `project-context.md` file that AI agents will read before implementing any code."
 
 **Execute the Generate Project Context workflow:**
 

src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/code-review/instructions.xml

@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@
       **Issues Fixed:** {{fixed_count}}
       **Action Items Created:** {{action_count}}
 
-      {{#if new_status == "done"}}Story is ready for next work!{{else}}Address the action items and continue development.{{/if}}
+      {{#if new_status == "done"}}Code review complete!{{else}}Address the action items and continue development.{{/if}}
     </output>
   </step>
 

src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/dev-story/checklist.md

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ validation-rules:
 - [ ] **Acceptance Criteria Satisfaction:** Implementation satisfies EVERY Acceptance Criterion in the story
 - [ ] **No Ambiguous Implementation:** Clear, unambiguous implementation that meets story requirements
 - [ ] **Edge Cases Handled:** Error conditions and edge cases appropriately addressed
-- [ ] **Dependencies Within Scope:** Only uses dependencies specified in story or project_context.md
+- [ ] **Dependencies Within Scope:** Only uses dependencies specified in story or project-context.md
 
 ## 🧪 Testing & Quality Assurance
 

src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/sprint-status/instructions.md

@@ -53,11 +53,9 @@ Run `/bmad:bmm:workflows:sprint-planning` to generate it, then rerun sprint-stat
   1. If any story status == in-progress → recommend `dev-story` for the first in-progress story
   2. Else if any story status == review → recommend `code-review` for the first review story
   3. Else if any story status == ready-for-dev → recommend `dev-story`
-  4. Else if any story status == drafted → recommend `story-ready`
+  4. Else if any story status == backlog → recommend `create-story`
-  5. Else if any story status == backlog → recommend `create-story`
+  5. Else if retrospectives are optional → recommend `retrospective`
-  6. Else if any epic status == backlog → recommend `epic-tech-context`
+  6. Else → All implementation items done; suggest `workflow-status` to plan next phase
-  7. Else if retrospectives are optional → recommend `retrospective`
-  8. Else → All implementation items done; suggest `workflow-status` to plan next phase
   <action>Store selected recommendation as: next_story_id, next_workflow_id, next_agent (SM/DEV as appropriate)</action>
 </step>
 

src/modules/bmm/workflows/generate-project-context/steps/step-01-discover.md

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Discover the project's technology stack, existing patterns, and critical impleme
 
 First, check if project context already exists:
 
-- Look for file at `{output_folder}/project_context.md`
+- Look for file at `{output_folder}/project-context.md`
 - If exists: Read complete file to understand existing rules
 - Present to user: "Found existing project context with {number_of_sections} sections. Would you like to update this or create a new one?"
 
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ Based on discovery, create or update the context document:
 
 #### A. Fresh Document Setup (if no existing context)
 
-Copy template from `{installed_path}/project-context-template.md` to `{output_folder}/project_context.md`
+Copy template from `{installed_path}/project-context-template.md` to `{output_folder}/project-context.md`
 Initialize frontmatter with:
 
 ```yaml

src/modules/bmm/workflows/generate-project-context/steps/step-02-generate.md

@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ After each category, show the generated rules and present choices:
 
 ## APPEND TO PROJECT CONTEXT:
 
-When user selects 'C' for a category, append the content directly to `{output_folder}/project_context.md` using the structure from step 8.
+When user selects 'C' for a category, append the content directly to `{output_folder}/project-context.md` using the structure from step 8.
 
 ## SUCCESS METRICS:
 

src/modules/bmm/workflows/generate-project-context/steps/step-03-complete.md

@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ Based on user skill level, present the completion:
 **Expert Mode:**
 "Project context complete. Optimized for LLM consumption with {{rule_count}} critical rules across {{section_count}} sections.
 
-File saved to: `{output_folder}/project_context.md`
+File saved to: `{output_folder}/project-context.md`
 
 Ready for AI agent integration."
 
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ Present final completion to user:
 "✅ **Project Context Generation Complete!**
 
 Your optimized project context file is ready at:
-`{output_folder}/project_context.md`
+`{output_folder}/project-context.md`
 
 **📊 Context Summary:**
 

src/modules/bmm/workflows/generate-project-context/workflow.md

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 ---
 name: generate-project-context
-description: Creates a concise project_context.md file with critical rules and patterns that AI agents must follow when implementing code. Optimized for LLM context efficiency.
+description: Creates a concise project-context.md file with critical rules and patterns that AI agents must follow when implementing code. Optimized for LLM context efficiency.
 ---
 
 # Generate Project Context Workflow
 
-**Goal:** Create a concise, optimized `project_context.md` file containing critical rules, patterns, and guidelines that AI agents must follow when implementing code. This file focuses on unobvious details that LLMs need to be reminded of.
+**Goal:** Create a concise, optimized `project-context.md` file containing critical rules, patterns, and guidelines that AI agents must follow when implementing code. This file focuses on unobvious details that LLMs need to be reminded of.
 
 **Your Role:** You are a technical facilitator working with a peer to capture the essential implementation rules that will ensure consistent, high-quality code generation across all AI agents working on the project.
 
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Load config from `{project-root}/.bmad/bmm/config.yaml` and resolve:
 
 - `installed_path` = `{project-root}/.bmad/bmm/workflows/generate-project-context`
 - `template_path` = `{installed_path}/project-context-template.md`
-- `output_file` = `{output_folder}/project_context.md`
+- `output_file` = `{output_folder}/project-context.md`
 
 ---
 

src/modules/bmm/workflows/testarch/test-design/workflow.yaml

@@ -24,8 +24,14 @@ variables:
 
 # Output configuration
 # Note: Actual output file determined dynamically based on mode detection
-# - System-Level (Phase 3): {output_folder}/test-design-system.md
+# Declared outputs for new workflow format
-# - Epic-Level (Phase 4): {output_folder}/test-design-epic-{epic_num}.md
+outputs:
+  - id: system-level
+    description: "System-level testability review (Phase 3)"
+    path: "{output_folder}/test-design-system.md"
+  - id: epic-level
+    description: "Epic-level test plan (Phase 4)"
+    path: "{output_folder}/test-design-epic-{epic_num}.md"
 default_output_file: "{output_folder}/test-design-epic-{epic_num}.md"
 
 # Required tools

tools/cli/installers/lib/core/config-collector.js

@@ -248,14 +248,21 @@ class ConfigCollector {
     const configKeys = Object.keys(moduleConfig).filter((key) => key !== 'prompt');
     const existingKeys = this.existingConfig && this.existingConfig[moduleName] ? Object.keys(this.existingConfig[moduleName]) : [];
 
+    // Find new interactive fields (with prompt)
     const newKeys = configKeys.filter((key) => {
       const item = moduleConfig[key];
       // Check if it's a config item and doesn't exist in existing config
       return item && typeof item === 'object' && item.prompt && !existingKeys.includes(key);
     });
 
-    // If in silent mode and no new keys, use existing config and skip prompts
+    // Find new static fields (without prompt, just result)
-    if (silentMode && newKeys.length === 0) {
+    const newStaticKeys = configKeys.filter((key) => {
+      const item = moduleConfig[key];
+      return item && typeof item === 'object' && !item.prompt && item.result && !existingKeys.includes(key);
+    });
+
+    // If in silent mode and no new keys (neither interactive nor static), use existing config and skip prompts
+    if (silentMode && newKeys.length === 0 && newStaticKeys.length === 0) {
       if (this.existingConfig && this.existingConfig[moduleName]) {
         if (!this.collectedConfig[moduleName]) {
           this.collectedConfig[moduleName] = {};
@@ -294,9 +301,12 @@ class ConfigCollector {
       return false; // No new fields
     }
 
-    // If we have new fields, build questions first
+    // If we have new fields (interactive or static), process them
-    if (newKeys.length > 0) {
+    if (newKeys.length > 0 || newStaticKeys.length > 0) {
       const questions = [];
+      const staticAnswers = {};
+
+      // Build questions for interactive fields
       for (const key of newKeys) {
         const item = moduleConfig[key];
         const question = await this.buildQuestion(moduleName, key, item, moduleConfig);
@@ -305,39 +315,50 @@ class ConfigCollector {
         }
       }
 
+      // Prepare static answers (no prompt, just result)
+      for (const key of newStaticKeys) {
+        staticAnswers[`${moduleName}_${key}`] = undefined;
+      }
+
+      // Collect all answers (static + prompted)
+      let allAnswers = { ...staticAnswers };
+
       if (questions.length > 0) {
         // Only show header if we actually have questions
         CLIUtils.displayModuleConfigHeader(moduleName, moduleConfig.header, moduleConfig.subheader);
         console.log(); // Line break before questions
-        const answers = await inquirer.prompt(questions);
+        const promptedAnswers = await inquirer.prompt(questions);
 
-        // Store answers for cross-referencing
+        // Merge prompted answers with static answers
-        Object.assign(this.allAnswers, answers);
+        Object.assign(allAnswers, promptedAnswers);
-
+      } else if (newStaticKeys.length > 0) {
-        // Process answers and build result values
+        // Only static fields, no questions - show no config message
-        for (const key of Object.keys(answers)) {
-          const originalKey = key.replace(`${moduleName}_`, '');
-          const item = moduleConfig[originalKey];
-          const value = answers[key];
-
-          let result;
-          if (Array.isArray(value)) {
-            result = value;
-          } else if (item.result) {
-            result = this.processResultTemplate(item.result, value);
-          } else {
-            result = value;
-          }
-
-          if (!this.collectedConfig[moduleName]) {
-            this.collectedConfig[moduleName] = {};
-          }
-          this.collectedConfig[moduleName][originalKey] = result;
-        }
-      } else {
-        // New keys exist but no questions generated - show no config message
         CLIUtils.displayModuleNoConfig(moduleName, moduleConfig.header, moduleConfig.subheader);
       }
+
+      // Store all answers for cross-referencing
+      Object.assign(this.allAnswers, allAnswers);
+
+      // Process all answers (both static and prompted)
+      for (const key of Object.keys(allAnswers)) {
+        const originalKey = key.replace(`${moduleName}_`, '');
+        const item = moduleConfig[originalKey];
+        const value = allAnswers[key];
+
+        let result;
+        if (Array.isArray(value)) {
+          result = value;
+        } else if (item.result) {
+          result = this.processResultTemplate(item.result, value);
+        } else {
+          result = value;
+        }
+
+        if (!this.collectedConfig[moduleName]) {
+          this.collectedConfig[moduleName] = {};
+        }
+        this.collectedConfig[moduleName][originalKey] = result;
+      }
     }
 
     // Copy over existing values for fields that weren't prompted
@@ -353,7 +374,7 @@ class ConfigCollector {
       }
     }
 
-    return newKeys.length > 0; // Return true if we prompted for new fields
+    return newKeys.length > 0 || newStaticKeys.length > 0; // Return true if we had any new fields (interactive or static)
   }
 
   /**
@@ -501,30 +522,52 @@ class ConfigCollector {
 
     // Process each config item
     const questions = [];
+    const staticAnswers = {};
     const configKeys = Object.keys(moduleConfig).filter((key) => key !== 'prompt');
 
     for (const key of configKeys) {
       const item = moduleConfig[key];
 
       // Skip if not a config object
-      if (!item || typeof item !== 'object' || !item.prompt) {
+      if (!item || typeof item !== 'object') {
         continue;
       }
 
-      const question = await this.buildQuestion(moduleName, key, item, moduleConfig);
+      // Handle static values (no prompt, just result)
-      if (question) {
+      if (!item.prompt && item.result) {
-        questions.push(question);
+        // Add to static answers with a marker value
+        staticAnswers[`${moduleName}_${key}`] = undefined;
+        continue;
+      }
+
+      // Handle interactive values (with prompt)
+      if (item.prompt) {
+        const question = await this.buildQuestion(moduleName, key, item, moduleConfig);
+        if (question) {
+          questions.push(question);
+        }
       }
     }
 
+    // Collect all answers (static + prompted)
+    let allAnswers = { ...staticAnswers };
+
     // Display appropriate header based on whether there are questions
     if (questions.length > 0) {
       CLIUtils.displayModuleConfigHeader(moduleName, moduleConfig.header, moduleConfig.subheader);
       console.log(); // Line break before questions
-      const answers = await inquirer.prompt(questions);
+      const promptedAnswers = await inquirer.prompt(questions);
 
-      // Store answers for cross-referencing
+      // Merge prompted answers with static answers
-      Object.assign(this.allAnswers, answers);
+      Object.assign(allAnswers, promptedAnswers);
+    }
+
+    // Store all answers for cross-referencing
+    Object.assign(this.allAnswers, allAnswers);
+
+    // Process all answers (both static and prompted)
+    if (Object.keys(allAnswers).length > 0) {
+      const answers = allAnswers;
 
       // Process answers and build result values
       for (const key of Object.keys(answers)) {