From 5f596f795a277314a7ff5a6749d521b64c32f83a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?M=C3=A5rten=20Angner?= Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2025 04:31:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] feat(wds): Update trigger map and quality check documentation to include feature impact insights Revised the trigger map documentation to replace the UX requirements section with prioritized features for development, emphasizing the importance of testimonials and case studies. Additionally, updated the quality check documentation to include checks for the new feature impact document, ensuring comprehensive coverage of project deliverables. This update aims to enhance clarity and focus on essential features that drive user engagement and project success. --- .../docs/2-trigger-map/00-trigger-map.md | 24 +- .../docs/2-trigger-map/06-Feature-Impact.md | 253 ++++++++++++++++++ .../steps/step-05-quality-check.md | 29 +- 3 files changed, 289 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) create mode 100644 src/modules/wds/examples/WDS-Presentation/docs/2-trigger-map/06-Feature-Impact.md diff --git a/src/modules/wds/examples/WDS-Presentation/docs/2-trigger-map/00-trigger-map.md b/src/modules/wds/examples/WDS-Presentation/docs/2-trigger-map/00-trigger-map.md index 94b7ef0a..6424defe 100644 --- a/src/modules/wds/examples/WDS-Presentation/docs/2-trigger-map/00-trigger-map.md +++ b/src/modules/wds/examples/WDS-Presentation/docs/2-trigger-map/00-trigger-map.md @@ -184,21 +184,19 @@ flowchart LR --- -**[06-Design-Implications.md](06-Design-Implications.md)** - UX requirements and content priorities +**[06-Feature-Impact.md](06-Feature-Impact.md)** - Prioritized features for UX and development (Optional Design Brief) -**Must Address (Critical for Conversion):** -1. Fear of AI replacing designers → Show how WDS makes designers indispensable -2. Lack of confidence with AI → Provide structured, hand-holding path -3. Feeling overwhelmed → Position as strategic leader who shoulders complexity -4. Wasting time on tools → Prove methodology with Dog Week case study -5. Not being valued → Show path to becoming "go-to expert" +**Top Priority Features (Must Have MVP):** +1. BMad Method Integration (Score: 11) - All personas benefit from seamless design-to-dev +2. Complete End-to-End Workflow (Score: 9) - Core differentiation from fragmented tools +3. Why-Based Specifications (Score: 9) - Makes Stina indispensable, Felix happy +4. Example Projects/Case Studies (Score: 8) - Proof that overcomes "wasting time" fear +5. Testimonials & Social Proof (Score: 8) - Peer validation from designers and entrepreneurs +6. Course Modules (Score: 6) - Hand-holding builds Stina's confidence +7. Installation Documentation (Score: 5) - Removes barrier to entry +8. WDS Agents (Score: 5) - The methodology in practice -**Content Priorities by Section:** -- **Hero:** Hook with "guiding light," address AI fear immediately -- **Methodology:** Show structure, prove with Dog Week, explain hand-holding -- **Benefits:** Make designer indispensable, AI as co-pilot, strategic leader -- **Course/Installation:** Clear path, low barrier, prove worth time investment -- **Social Proof:** Early evangelists, real case studies, designer testimonials +**Key Insight:** Testimonials complement case studies - case studies prove methodology works, testimonials prove it's worth the effort through peer validation. --- diff --git a/src/modules/wds/examples/WDS-Presentation/docs/2-trigger-map/06-Feature-Impact.md b/src/modules/wds/examples/WDS-Presentation/docs/2-trigger-map/06-Feature-Impact.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6d413673 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/modules/wds/examples/WDS-Presentation/docs/2-trigger-map/06-Feature-Impact.md @@ -0,0 +1,253 @@ +# Feature Impact Analysis: WDS Presentation Page + +> **Status: Beta** - Scoring system being refined through real-world use + +**Created:** December 27, 2025 +**Updated:** December 27, 2025 (Added Testimonials feature) +**Analyst:** Saga with Mårten Angner +**Purpose:** Design Brief - Strategic guidance for UX Design and Development prioritization + +--- + +## Scoring Legend + +**Primary Persona (⭐ Stina):** High = 5 pts | Medium = 3 pts | Low = 1 pt +**Other Personas (Lars, Felix):** High = 3 pts | Medium = 1 pt | Low = 0 pts + +**Max Possible Score:** 11 (with 3 personas) +**Must Have Threshold:** 8+ or Primary High (5) + +--- + +## Prioritized Features + +| Rank | Feature | Stina ⭐ | Lars | Felix | **Score** | **Decision** | +| ---- | ------- | -------- | ---- | ----- | --------- | ------------ | +| 1 | BMad Method Integration (WDS → BMM) | HIGH (5) | HIGH (3) | HIGH (3) | **11** | **MUST HAVE** | +| 2 | Complete End-to-End Workflow | HIGH (5) | HIGH (3) | MED (1) | **9** | **MUST HAVE** | +| 3 | Why-Based Specifications | HIGH (5) | MED (1) | HIGH (3) | **9** | **MUST HAVE** | +| 4 | Example Projects & Case Studies | HIGH (5) | HIGH (3) | LOW (0) | **8** | **MUST HAVE** | +| 5 | Testimonials & Social Proof | HIGH (5) | HIGH (3) | LOW (0) | **8** | **MUST HAVE** | +| 6 | Course Modules (Video + Lessons) | HIGH (5) | MED (1) | LOW (0) | **6** | **MUST HAVE** | +| 7 | Installation & Setup Documentation | HIGH (5) | LOW (0) | LOW (0) | **5** | **MUST HAVE** | +| 8 | WDS Agents (Saga, Freyja, Idunn, Mimir) | HIGH (5) | LOW (0) | LOW (0) | **5** | **MUST HAVE** | +| 9 | Design System Module | MED (3) | MED (1) | MED (1) | **5** | **CONSIDER** | +| 10 | GitHub Repository & Documentation | MED (3) | LOW (0) | MED (1) | **4** | **CONSIDER** | +| 11 | Community & Discord Support | MED (3) | LOW (0) | LOW (0) | **3** | **CONSIDER** | + +--- + +## Feature Details & Rationale + +### Must Have MVP (Primary High OR Top Tier Score) + +#### 1. BMad Method Integration (Score: 11) 🏆 +**Seamless handoff from design to development phases** + +- **Stina Impact (HIGH):** Enables "make real impact" - her designs actually get built properly +- **Lars Impact (HIGH):** Smooth workflow = team productivity + quality delivery +- **Felix Impact (HIGH):** Structured handoff = clear specs = enlightened day + +**Why This Matters:** All three personas benefit. This is the bridge that makes WDS complete - designers create, developers implement smoothly. Without this, value proposition breaks down. + +--- + +#### 2. Complete End-to-End Workflow (Score: 9) +**Full methodology covering all phases from vision to handoff** + +- **Stina Impact (HIGH):** Addresses "being strategic expert" want - she owns the complete journey +- **Lars Impact (HIGH):** Ensures quality throughout entire process, no gaps +- **Felix Impact (MEDIUM):** Better handoff means fewer headaches + +**Why This Matters:** Core differentiation from fragmented tools. Shows WDS isn't just another prototyping tool - it's a complete professional methodology. + +--- + +#### 3. Why-Based Specifications (Score: 9) +**Specifications that explain WHAT + WHY + WHAT NOT TO DO** + +- **Stina Impact (HIGH):** Makes her indispensable - her thinking is preserved +- **Lars Impact (MEDIUM):** Better quality, less confusion in execution +- **Felix Impact (HIGH):** Directly addresses his "clear specs" want - major pain point solved + +**Why This Matters:** This is the secret sauce. Felix's happiness depends on this. Stina becomes irreplaceable because AI can't replicate her "why." Lars gets quality. + +--- + +#### 4. Example Projects & Case Studies (Score: 8) +**Real-world examples showing WDS in action (Dog Week: 5x faster)** + +- **Stina Impact (HIGH):** Addresses "wasting time" fear - proof it works before investing effort +- **Lars Impact (HIGH):** Validates methodology before committing his team +- **Felix Impact (LOW):** Nice to see, but doesn't directly help him + +**Why This Matters:** Trust builder. Stina and Lars both need proof before adopting. Dog Week case study (26 weeks → 5 weeks) is compelling evidence. + +--- + +#### 5. Testimonials & Social Proof (Score: 8) +**Real designer and client testimonials showing WDS impact** + +- **Stina Impact (HIGH):** Addresses "wasting time" fear - peer validation from other designers who succeeded +- **Lars Impact (HIGH):** Social proof from other entrepreneurs validates investment decision +- **Felix Impact (LOW):** Doesn't care about marketing; cares about actual specs quality + +**Why This Matters:** Peer validation is different from case studies. While case studies provide detailed proof, testimonials give quick emotional reassurance. "People like me succeeded with this" is powerful for both Stina (designer peers) and Lars (business peers). This complements Example Projects - case studies prove methodology works, testimonials prove it's worth the effort. + +--- + +#### 6. Course Modules (Score: 6) +**Educational content teaching WDS step-by-step with video + lessons** + +- **Stina Impact (HIGH):** Addresses "wasting time" fear + builds AI confidence through hand-holding +- **Lars Impact (MEDIUM):** Helps him understand what his designer will use +- **Felix Impact (LOW):** Not his primary concern + +**Why This Matters:** Critical for Stina's transformation. Without structured learning, she won't gain confidence. The hand-holding approach is essential. + +--- + +#### 7. Installation & Setup Documentation (Score: 5) +**Clear step-by-step guide to getting WDS running** + +- **Stina Impact (HIGH):** Addresses "wasting time" fear - removes barrier to entry +- **Lars Impact (LOW):** His designer's responsibility +- **Felix Impact (LOW):** Designer's setup process + +**Why This Matters:** All Primary High features are Must Have. If Stina can't get started easily, she'll abandon WDS. Hand-holding is critical for adoption. + +--- + +#### 8. WDS Agents (Score: 5) +**AI agents (Saga, Freyja, Idunn, Mimir) that guide through each phase** + +- **Stina Impact (HIGH):** Core value - "AI as co-pilot" with structured guidance +- **Lars Impact (LOW):** Behind-the-scenes tool for his designer +- **Felix Impact (LOW):** Designer's workflow, not his + +**Why This Matters:** All Primary High features are Must Have. The agents ARE the methodology in practice. This is how Stina experiences "shouldering complexity with excitement." + +--- + +### Consider for MVP + +#### 9. Design System Module (Score: 5) +**Structured approach to creating reusable design systems** + +- **Stina Impact (MEDIUM):** Professional capability, but not core transformation +- **Lars Impact (MEDIUM):** Nice for consistency across products +- **Felix Impact (MEDIUM):** Helps with implementation consistency + +**Why Consider:** Valuable for mature teams with multiple products, but not critical for Stina's initial transformation or Lars's immediate needs. Can be added post-MVP. + +--- + +#### 10. GitHub Repository & Documentation (Score: 4) +**Open-source access to all WDS resources** + +- **Stina Impact (MEDIUM):** Access is important, but content matters more +- **Lars Impact (LOW):** Not his world +- **Felix Impact (MEDIUM):** Familiar format, appreciates documentation + +**Why Consider:** GitHub IS where WDS lives, so this exists by default. But prominence on the presentation page is secondary to explaining value and methodology. + +--- + +#### 11. Community & Discord Support (Score: 3) +**Active community for questions, sharing, and collaboration** + +- **Stina Impact (MEDIUM):** Support reduces risk, but not core transformation +- **Lars Impact (LOW):** His designer's resource +- **Felix Impact (LOW):** Designer community, not his focus + +**Why Consider:** Valuable for retention and ongoing support, but not critical for initial adoption decision. Mention it, but don't feature prominently in MVP. + +--- + +## Strategic Implications for UX Design + +### **Hero Section Priority:** +Focus on **BMad Integration**, **End-to-End Workflow**, and **Why-Based Specs** - the top differentiators that serve all personas. + +### **Early Content Focus:** +Lead with **Example Projects** (proof) and **Testimonials** (peer validation) to overcome Stina's "wasting time" fear and Lars's validation need. Follow with **Complete Workflow** (differentiation). + +### **Course Module Prominence:** +Make **Course Modules** and **Installation** highly visible and accessible - remove all friction from Stina's learning path. + +### **Agent Introduction:** +Present **WDS Agents** as the personality and guide of the methodology - make them relatable and trustworthy. + +### **Secondary Features:** +Mention **Design System**, **GitHub**, and **Community** but don't feature them prominently in MVP content. + +--- + +## Development Phase Implications + +### **Phase 1 MVP:** +- BMad Method Integration messaging +- Complete workflow explanation +- Why-based specifications showcase +- Dog Week case study (prominent) +- Testimonials from early adopters (designer + entrepreneur + developer perspectives) +- Course Modules 01-02 (complete) +- Installation guide (detailed) +- Agent introductions (personality-driven) + +### **Phase 2 Enhancements:** +- Design System module details +- GitHub repository prominence +- Community/Discord integration +- Additional case studies +- More course modules + +--- + +## Key Insights + +### **The Flywheel in Features:** + +1. **Proof It Works** (Example Projects + Testimonials) → Stina and Lars trust WDS +2. **Easy to Start** (Installation + Course) → Stina begins learning +3. **Structured Guidance** (Agents + Workflow) → Stina gains confidence +4. **Better Specs** (Why-Based) → Felix's life improves +5. **Smooth Handoff** (BMad Integration) → Lars sees quality + productivity +6. **Success Creates Evangelists** → More testimonials → 50 hardcore believers emerge + +### **Felix is the Secret Weapon:** + +Why-Based Specifications (Score: 9) directly addresses Felix's main pain point. When Felix's day is "enlightened" by clear specs, he becomes an advocate. This validates Lars's investment and proves Stina's value. + +**Design Implication:** Show how WDS makes developers happy - this is proof of designer value. + +### **All Primary High Features Matter:** + +Every feature where Stina scored HIGH (5) is Must Have MVP. Why? Because Stina IS the engine. The 50 evangelists come from successful Stinas. Without her complete transformation, the flywheel doesn't start. + +--- + +## Questions for Designer (Phase 4) + +When designing the page, consider: + +1. **How do we make BMad Integration tangible?** (It's abstract but highest-scoring) +2. **Should Dog Week case study have its own section or integrate throughout?** +3. **Testimonials: Where and how many?** (Need designer, entrepreneur, and developer perspectives) +4. **How much personality should agents have on the page?** (Critical feature but hard to show) +5. **Installation: Prominent CTA or embedded in course section?** +6. **How do we show "end-to-end" visually?** (Diagram? Illustration?) + +--- + +**Navigation:** + +← [Back to Key Insights](05-Key-Insights.md) | [Back to Trigger Map Hub](00-trigger-map.md) + +--- + +_Generated by Whiteport Design Studio_ +_Strategic input for Phase 4: UX Design and Phase 6: PRD/Development_ +_Methodology: Feature Impact Analysis (Beta) - Feedback welcome_ + + diff --git a/src/modules/wds/workflows/2-trigger-mapping/document-generation/steps/step-05-quality-check.md b/src/modules/wds/workflows/2-trigger-mapping/document-generation/steps/step-05-quality-check.md index d88a8380..40fe5088 100644 --- a/src/modules/wds/workflows/2-trigger-mapping/document-generation/steps/step-05-quality-check.md +++ b/src/modules/wds/workflows/2-trigger-mapping/document-generation/steps/step-05-quality-check.md @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ - [ ] `03-[Secondary Persona].md` exists - [ ] `04-[Tertiary Persona].md` exists (if applicable) - [ ] `05-Key-Insights.md` exists +- [ ] `06-Feature-Impact.md` exists (if Feature Impact workshop was completed) - [ ] All files use consistent naming pattern --- @@ -83,6 +84,12 @@ - [ ] Links to 01-Business-Goals.md - [ ] Links to all persona docs +**06-Feature-Impact.md (if exists):** +- [ ] Links back to 00-trigger-map.md +- [ ] Links to 01-Business-Goals.md +- [ ] Links to all persona docs +- [ ] Links to 05-Key-Insights.md + --- ### 6. Persona Document Completeness @@ -143,7 +150,20 @@ --- -### 10. Priority Tier Consistency +### 10. Feature Impact Document (06) Completeness (If Exists) + +- [ ] Scoring system clearly explained +- [ ] Primary persona weighted higher (5/3/1 vs 3/1/0) +- [ ] Feature table with scores for all personas +- [ ] Must Have / Consider / Defer categories +- [ ] Strategic rationale explains prioritization +- [ ] Connection to business goals shown +- [ ] Development phases aligned with flywheel +- [ ] Each feature ties to specific persona drivers + +--- + +### 11. Priority Tier Consistency **Verify throughout all documents:** @@ -156,7 +176,7 @@ --- -### 11. Driving Forces Quality +### 12. Driving Forces Quality **For each persona's 6 driving forces:** @@ -168,7 +188,7 @@ --- -### 12. Formatting Check +### 13. Formatting Check - [ ] Markdown renders correctly - [ ] Headers use proper hierarchy (# ## ###) @@ -205,7 +225,8 @@ Once all checks pass, output: ├── 02-[Primary Name].md ([X] lines) - Primary persona ├── 03-[Secondary Name].md ([X] lines) - Secondary persona ├── 04-[Tertiary Name].md ([X] lines) - Tertiary persona [if exists] -└── 05-Key-Insights.md ([X] lines) - Strategic implications +├── 05-Key-Insights.md ([X] lines) - Strategic implications +└── 06-Feature-Impact.md ([X] lines) - Feature prioritization [if workshop completed] ``` **Quality Verified:**