diff --git a/docs/kiss-command.md b/docs/kiss-command.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8f7f7393
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/kiss-command.md
@@ -0,0 +1,577 @@
+# BMad Method PR #3: /kiss Command (Keep It Simple & Short)
+
+**Feature Type**: User experience enhancement / Workflow optimization
+**Status**: Draft for community review
+**Origin**: tellingCube project (masemIT e.U.)
+**Author**: Mario Semper (@sempre)
+**Date**: 2025-11-23
+
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+**`/kiss` command** provides users a quick way to signal agents to keep responses concise and focused, preventing chat overload with unnecessary information.
+
+**KISS = Keep It Simple & Short**
+
+---
+
+## Problem Statement
+
+### Real-World User Frustration
+
+**Scenario**: User needs quick answer or wants to stay focused on execution, but agents provide verbose explanations, alternatives, and context that clutter the chat.
+
+**Current BMad Behavior:**
+```yaml
+User: "Create the login form component"
+
+Agent:
+  - Explains why login forms are important
+  - Lists 5 different authentication approaches
+  - Discusses security considerations
+  - Asks 3 clarifying questions
+  - Suggests 2 alternative implementations
+  - THEN creates the component
+
+❌ Result: 30 lines of chat before action, user overwhelmed
+```
+
+**What user wanted:**
+```yaml
+User: "Create the login form component /kiss"
+
+Agent:
+  - Creates the component
+  - Brief confirmation message
+
+✅ Result: 3 lines, stays focused, keeps momentum
+```
+
+---
+
+## Proposed Solution: /kiss Command
+
+### Command Syntax
+
+```bash
+/kiss
+```
+
+**Can appear anywhere in user message:**
+- At the end: `"Fix the bug in auth.ts /kiss"`
+- At the start: `"/kiss Show me the error logs"`
+- Standalone: `"/kiss"` (applies to next agent response)
+
+---
+
+## Behavior Specification
+
+### When `/kiss` is Used
+
+**Agent MUST:**
+1. ✅ **Skip explanations** - No "why" or "how it works" unless critical
+2. ✅ **Skip alternatives** - Don't offer other approaches unless asked
+3. ✅ **Skip exploratory questions** - Make reasonable assumptions
+4. ✅ **Execute directly** - Jump to action, not discussion
+5. ✅ **Confirm briefly** - 1-2 sentences max
+
+**Agent SHOULD:**
+- Present results concisely (code, output, answer)
+- Use bullet points over paragraphs
+- Omit context user already knows
+- Save details for follow-up if user asks
+
+**Agent MUST NOT:**
+- Skip critical safety checks (destructive operations still need confirmation)
+- Hide errors or important warnings
+- Omit information that would cause user to make wrong decision
+
+---
+
+## Use Cases
+
+### 1. Quick Fixes
+```
+User: "Add error handling to the login function /kiss"
+
+Agent (WITHOUT /kiss):
+"I'll add error handling to the login function. There are several
+approaches we could take:
+1. Try-catch blocks
+2. Promise rejection handling
+3. Validation middleware
+Which approach would you prefer? Also, should we log errors to
+Sentry or just console? Let me know and I'll implement..."
+
+Agent (WITH /kiss):
+"Added try-catch with Sentry logging:
+[code block]
+Done ✅"
+```
+
+### 2. Information Retrieval
+```
+User: "What's the current Stripe pricing tier configuration /kiss"
+
+Agent (WITHOUT /kiss):
+"Great question! The Stripe pricing configuration is stored in
+components/landing/PricingSection.tsx. Let me explain the structure:
+
+The pricing tiers follow a founding member model with lifetime access.
+This is interesting because... [3 more paragraphs]"
+
+Agent (WITH /kiss):
+"5 tiers: €29, €99, €299, €599, €999 (lifetime, one-time)
+Source: components/landing/PricingSection.tsx"
+```
+
+### 3. Status Checks
+```
+User: "Are all tests passing? /kiss"
+
+Agent (WITHOUT /kiss):
+"Let me run the test suite for you. Our testing strategy includes
+unit tests using Jest, integration tests, and E2E tests with Playwright.
+I'll now execute the test command... [runs tests]...
+The results show..."
+
+Agent (WITH /kiss):
+"✅ All tests passing (23/23)
+Runtime: 4.2s"
+```
+
+### 4. Execution Mode
+```
+User: "We discussed the approach earlier. Just implement it. /kiss"
+
+Agent (WITHOUT /kiss):
+"Before I implement, let me confirm the approach we discussed:
+1. Use event-sourcing architecture
+2. Store events in NeonDB
+3. Generate views via SQL
+Is this correct? Also, should I..."
+
+Agent (WITH /kiss):
+[Implements directly, shows result]
+"Implemented. Ready for review."
+```
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Options
+
+### Option A: Command Flag (Simplest)
+
+**In agent system prompt:**
+```markdown
+If user includes `/kiss` in their message:
+- Keep response under 5 lines
+- No explanations unless critical
+- Execute directly, confirm briefly
+- Skip alternatives and exploratory questions
+```
+
+**Pros:**
+- Simple to implement (prompt addition)
+- Works immediately across all agents
+- No code changes needed
+
+**Cons:**
+- Agents must remember to check for `/kiss`
+- May be forgotten in complex agent definitions
+
+---
+
+### Option B: Global Flag (Most Robust)
+
+**In BMad core:**
+```typescript
+interface UserMessage {
+  content: string
+  flags: {
+    kiss: boolean  // Detected from /kiss in message
+  }
+}
+
+function parseMessage(raw: string): UserMessage {
+  const kiss = raw.includes('/kiss')
+  const content = raw.replace('/kiss', '').trim()
+  return { content, flags: { kiss } }
+}
+```
+
+**Agent access:**
+```markdown
+Context available to all agents:
+- message.flags.kiss: boolean
+
+If true:
+- Response must be concise (< 5 lines preferred)
+- Action-first, explanation-optional
+```
+
+**Pros:**
+- Guaranteed all agents respect flag
+- Easier for agents (don't need to parse)
+- Can extend with other flags (/verbose, /explain, etc.)
+
+**Cons:**
+- Requires BMad core changes
+- Slightly more implementation work
+
+---
+
+### Option C: Mode Switch (Advanced)
+
+**User can toggle mode:**
+```bash
+*mode kiss    # All responses now concise until toggled off
+*mode normal  # Back to default verbosity
+```
+
+**Pros:**
+- Don't need to type `/kiss` every time
+- Good for execution-heavy sessions
+
+**Cons:**
+- More complex to implement
+- User might forget they're in KISS mode
+- Harder to mix verbosity levels
+
+---
+
+## Recommended: Option A (Start Simple)
+
+**Rationale:**
+- Fastest to implement (just prompt update)
+- Test user adoption before building complex infrastructure
+- Can evolve to Option B or C if popular
+
+**Implementation Steps:**
+1. Add `/kiss` detection to all agent prompts
+2. Define behavior rules (5 lines, action-first)
+3. Update BMad user guide with `/kiss` documentation
+4. Gather feedback from community
+5. Iterate based on usage patterns
+
+---
+
+## Behavior Examples (Detailed)
+
+### Example 1: Code Creation
+```
+User: "Create a validation utility for email addresses /kiss"
+
+❌ WITHOUT /kiss (Verbose):
+"I'll create a validation utility for email addresses. Email validation
+is tricky because there are many valid formats according to RFC 5322.
+I recommend using a regex pattern that covers most common cases while
+avoiding false positives. Here's my approach:
+
+1. Use standard email regex
+2. Add domain verification (optional)
+3. Sanitize input first
+4. Return boolean + error message
+
+[Creates utility]
+
+The utility handles:
+- Format validation
+- Common typo detection
+- Disposable email blocking (optional)
+
+Would you like me to add any of these additional features?"
+
+✅ WITH /kiss (Concise):
+"Created email validator:
+[code block]
+Returns {valid: boolean, error?: string}"
+```
+
+---
+
+### Example 2: Error Investigation
+```
+User: "Why is the build failing? /kiss"
+
+❌ WITHOUT /kiss (Verbose):
+"Let me investigate the build failure. I'll check several potential
+causes:
+1. TypeScript errors
+2. Missing dependencies
+3. Configuration issues
+4. Environment variables
+
+[Runs build, analyzes logs]
+
+The build is failing due to a TypeScript error in auth.ts. This is
+happening because the `User` type doesn't match the return type of
+the database query. TypeScript's type system is trying to enforce
+type safety here, which is good because..."
+
+✅ WITH /kiss (Concise):
+"Build error: Type mismatch in auth.ts:42
+Expected: User | null
+Got: User | undefined
+
+Fix: Change `getUser()` return type to `User | null`"
+```
+
+---
+
+### Example 3: Project Status
+```
+User: "What's the current sprint status? /kiss"
+
+❌ WITHOUT /kiss (Verbose):
+"Let me give you a comprehensive sprint status update. Our current
+sprint (Sprint 14) started on Monday and runs through next Friday.
+We're using 2-week sprints as defined in our agile process. Let me
+break down the status by epic:
+
+Epic 1: User Authentication
+- Story 1.1: Login form ✅ (Completed)
+- Story 1.2: Signup flow ✅ (Completed)
+- Story 1.3: Password reset 🟡 (In Progress)
+  - This one is taking longer because we discovered...
+
+Epic 2: Dashboard
+..."
+
+✅ WITH /kiss (Concise):
+"Sprint 14 (Day 8/14):
+✅ 12 stories done
+🟡 3 in progress
+⏳ 2 remaining
+On track for Friday delivery"
+```
+
+---
+
+## When NOT to Use /kiss (Safety Considerations)
+
+### Destructive Operations (Always Confirm)
+```
+User: "Delete the production database /kiss"
+
+Agent (Correct Behavior):
+"⚠️ This is a DESTRUCTIVE operation affecting production.
+
+Are you sure you want to delete the production database?
+Type 'YES DELETE PRODUCTION DATABASE' to confirm.
+
+(Note: /kiss does not skip safety checks for destructive operations)"
+```
+
+**Rationale:** User safety > brevity
+
+---
+
+### Critical Errors (Don't Hide Details)
+```
+User: "Deploy to production /kiss"
+
+Agent (Correct Behavior):
+"❌ Deploy blocked - 3 critical errors:
+1. Tests failing (auth.test.ts:45)
+2. TypeScript errors in 2 files
+3. Missing required env var: STRIPE_SECRET_KEY
+
+/kiss mode active, but showing errors because deployment would fail.
+Fix these first?"
+```
+
+**Rationale:** User needs to know WHY deployment failed
+
+---
+
+### Ambiguous Requests (Ask, Don't Assume)
+```
+User: "Update the pricing /kiss"
+
+Agent (Correct Behavior):
+"Which pricing?
+- Stripe product prices
+- Landing page display
+- Documentation
+
+(Need clarification even in /kiss mode)"
+```
+
+**Rationale:** Guessing wrong wastes more time than asking
+
+---
+
+## Benefits
+
+✅ **Reduces chat clutter** - Keeps conversation focused
+✅ **Maintains momentum** - Less reading, more doing
+✅ **Respects user expertise** - Assumes user knows context
+✅ **Faster execution** - Skip discussion, jump to action
+✅ **Optional, not forced** - User controls verbosity per-message
+
+---
+
+## Tradeoffs & Considerations
+
+### Pro: User Control
+- User decides when to use /kiss
+- Can mix verbose and concise in same session
+- No permanent mode change
+
+### Con: May Skip Helpful Context
+- New users might miss learning opportunities
+- Complex decisions might need more discussion
+- User must know to ask for details if needed
+
+**Mitigation:** Agents can offer "Want details?" at end of concise response
+
+---
+
+### Pro: Reduces Token Usage
+- Shorter agent responses = fewer tokens
+- Saves costs in high-volume sessions
+- Faster response time (less generation)
+
+### Con: May Require Follow-Up
+- User asks "Why?" after concise answer
+- Could use more tokens in total if clarification needed
+
+**Mitigation:** Agents should be smart about what's "brief enough"
+
+---
+
+## Rollout Strategy
+
+### Phase 1: Soft Launch (Week 1-2)
+- Add `/kiss` to core agent prompts
+- Update BMad user guide
+- Announce in community Discord/forum
+- Gather initial feedback
+
+### Phase 2: Refinement (Week 3-4)
+- Analyze usage patterns (how often used?)
+- Identify edge cases (when does /kiss fail?)
+- Refine behavior rules based on feedback
+- A/B test different verbosity thresholds
+
+### Phase 3: Expansion (Month 2+)
+- Consider `/explain` (opposite of /kiss)
+- Consider `/verbose` (maximum detail mode)
+- Consider mode switching (`*mode kiss`)
+- Community voting on preferred approach
+
+---
+
+## Real-World Validation
+
+**Origin Project:** tellingCube (masemIT e.U.)
+
+**User Pain Point (Mario Semper):**
+> "Sometimes I just need the answer, not a lecture. When I'm in flow state, reading 20 lines of explanation breaks my focus. /kiss would let me signal: I know what I'm doing, just execute."
+
+**Example from tellingCube:**
+```
+Mario: "Show me the current pricing tiers /kiss"
+
+River (after implementing /kiss):
+"€29, €99, €299, €599, €999 (lifetime)
+components/landing/PricingSection.tsx"
+
+Mario: "Perfect, thanks."
+```
+
+**Before /kiss:**
+River would explain the Kickstarter model, founding member strategy, tier reasoning, future pricing changes, etc. (12 lines)
+
+**After /kiss:**
+2 lines, instant answer, Mario stays in flow.
+
+---
+
+## Comparison to Similar Patterns
+
+| Pattern | Use Case | When to Use |
+|---------|----------|-------------|
+| **`/kiss`** | Quick execution, minimal chat | User knows what they want, wants brevity |
+| `/explain` | Detailed explanations | User learning, needs context |
+| `/verbose` | Maximum detail | Debugging, auditing, teaching |
+| ROF sessions | Multi-agent collaboration | Complex analysis needing multiple perspectives |
+| Pre-flight | Safety checks | High-risk public outputs |
+
+**KISS is complementary** to other patterns - can use `/kiss` within ROF sessions, etc.
+
+---
+
+## Open Questions for Community
+
+1. **Verbosity Threshold**: What's "brief enough"? 3 lines? 5 lines? 10 lines?
+2. **Default Behavior**: Should agents auto-detect when to be brief, or only via `/kiss`?
+3. **Mode vs. Flag**: Per-message `/kiss` or mode switching (`*mode kiss`)?
+4. **Opposite Command**: Should we also have `/explain` or `/verbose`?
+5. **Safety Override**: What operations ALWAYS require verbose confirmation despite `/kiss`?
+
+---
+
+## Next Steps
+
+1. **Community feedback** on approach and verbosity rules
+2. **Pilot implementation** in BMad core or as agent prompt addition
+3. **User testing** with tellingCube and other projects
+4. **Iteration** based on usage patterns
+5. **Documentation** in BMad user guide
+
+---
+
+## Proposed Documentation
+
+### User Guide Entry
+
+````markdown
+## /kiss - Keep It Simple & Short
+
+**When to use:** You want quick, concise responses without explanations.
+
+**Syntax:**
+```
+/kiss
+```
+
+**Example:**
+```
+User: "Run the tests /kiss"
+Agent: "✅ 23/23 passing (4.2s)"
+```
+
+**What changes:**
+- Responses under 5 lines (typically)
+- No explanations unless critical
+- Direct execution, brief confirmation
+- No alternatives offered
+
+**Safety:** Destructive operations still require confirmation.
+
+**Not working?** Some agents may not support /kiss yet.
+````
+
+---
+
+## References
+
+- **Source Project**: tellingCube (https://github.com/masemIT/telling-cube) [if public]
+- **User Feedback**: Mario Semper (@sempre)
+- **Related PRs**:
+  - PR #964 Ring of Fire (multi-agent collaboration)
+  - PR #965 Pre-Flight Protocol (safety framework)
+
+---
+
+**Contribution ready for review.** Let's make BMad more responsive to user workflow preferences! 🎯
+
+---
+
+**Memes Welcome:**
+- "KISS: Keeping Agents Concise Since 2025"
+- "More doing, less explaining"
+- "TL;DR mode for agents"