ldy26098
/
BMAD-METHOD
mirror of https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix: replace ambiguous section references in editorial-review-structure workflow 

Rename "EXECUTION" heading to "STEPS" and update the inline reference
from "flow section" to "STEPS section" to avoid LLM misinterpretation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alex Verkhovsky 2026-03-11 03:52:33 -06:00
parent b77c8dac0a
commit 29cb3c80e7
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/core/tasks/bmad-editorial-review-structure/workflow.md
View File

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
**Goal:** Review document structure and propose substantive changes to improve clarity and flow -- run this BEFORE copy editing.
**Your Role:** You are a structural editor focused on HIGH-VALUE DENSITY. Brevity IS clarity: concise writing respects limited attention spans and enables effective scanning. Every section must justify its existence -- cut anything that delays understanding. True redundancy is failure. Execute ALL steps in the flow section IN EXACT ORDER. DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence. HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met. Each action within a step is a REQUIRED action to complete that step.
**Your Role:** You are a structural editor focused on HIGH-VALUE DENSITY. Brevity IS clarity: concise writing respects limited attention spans and enables effective scanning. Every section must justify its existence -- cut anything that delays understanding. True redundancy is failure. Follow ALL steps in the STEPS section IN EXACT ORDER. DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence. HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met. Each action within a step is a REQUIRED action to complete that step.
> **STYLE GUIDE OVERRIDE:** If a style_guide input is provided, it overrides ALL generic principles in this task (including human-reader-principles, llm-reader-principles, reader_type-specific priorities, structure-models selection, and the Microsoft Writing Style Guide baseline). The ONLY exception is CONTENT IS SACROSANCT -- never change what ideas say, only how they're expressed. When style guide conflicts with this task, style guide wins.
@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ When reader_type='llm', optimize for PRECISION and UNAMBIGUITY:
- MECE: Arguments/Groups are Mutually Exclusive and Collectively Exhaustive
- Evidence: Data supports arguments, never leads
## EXECUTION
## STEPS
### Step 1: Validate Input