# Enterprise Architecture Assessment

## Document Information

| Document Details |                                      |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------|
| **Title**       | Enterprise Architecture Assessment   |
| **System/Domain**| [System or Domain Name]             |
| **Date**        | [Assessment Date]                    |
| **Version**     | [Version Number]                     |
| **Prepared By** | [Author Name and Role]               |
| **Approved By** | [Approver Name and Role]             |

## Executive Summary

[Provide a concise summary of the assessment findings, highlighting key strengths, critical gaps, major risks, and top recommendations. This section should be brief (1-2 paragraphs) and focused on the most important insights for executive stakeholders.]

### Key Findings

- [Key finding 1]
- [Key finding 2]
- [Key finding 3]
- [Key finding 4]
- [Key finding 5]

### Critical Recommendations

- [Critical recommendation 1]
- [Critical recommendation 2]
- [Critical recommendation 3]

## 1. Assessment Context

### 1.1 Assessment Scope

[Define the scope of the architecture assessment, including systems, applications, infrastructure, and business domains covered. Also note any exclusions or limitations.]

### 1.2 Assessment Approach

[Describe the methodology used for the assessment, including frameworks, tools, interview approach, and documentation review process.]

### 1.3 Stakeholders Consulted

| Name | Role | Department | Input Provided |
|------|------|------------|---------------|
| [Name] | [Role] | [Department] | [Brief description of input] |
| [Name] | [Role] | [Department] | [Brief description of input] |
| [Name] | [Role] | [Department] | [Brief description of input] |

### 1.4 Reference Documents

| Document Name | Version | Date | Description |
|---------------|---------|------|-------------|
| [Document Name] | [Version] | [Date] | [Brief description] |
| [Document Name] | [Version] | [Date] | [Brief description] |
| [Document Name] | [Version] | [Date] | [Brief description] |

## 2. Current Architecture Overview

### 2.1 Business Context

[Describe the business context, including key business drivers, strategic objectives, and how the assessed architecture supports business capabilities.]

### 2.2 Architecture Inventory

#### 2.2.1 Applications and Services

| Application/Service | Description | Technology Stack | Business Capability | Lifecycle Status |
|---------------------|-------------|------------------|---------------------|------------------|
| [Name] | [Description] | [Stack] | [Capability] | [Status] |
| [Name] | [Description] | [Stack] | [Capability] | [Status] |
| [Name] | [Description] | [Stack] | [Capability] | [Status] |

#### 2.2.2 Infrastructure Components

| Component Type | Description | Technology | Environment | Lifecycle Status |
|----------------|-------------|------------|-------------|------------------|
| [Type] | [Description] | [Technology] | [Environment] | [Status] |
| [Type] | [Description] | [Technology] | [Environment] | [Status] |
| [Type] | [Description] | [Technology] | [Environment] | [Status] |

#### 2.2.3 Integration Points

| Integration | Source | Target | Integration Method | Data Flow | Criticality |
|-------------|--------|--------|-------------------|-----------|-------------|
| [Name] | [Source] | [Target] | [Method] | [Flow] | [Criticality] |
| [Name] | [Source] | [Target] | [Method] | [Flow] | [Criticality] |
| [Name] | [Source] | [Target] | [Method] | [Flow] | [Criticality] |

### 2.3 Current Architecture Diagrams

[Include key architecture diagrams that represent the current state. This may include high-level system context diagrams, component diagrams, deployment diagrams, and data flow diagrams.]

## 3. Standards Compliance Assessment

### 3.1 Enterprise Standards Overview

[Summarize the enterprise architecture standards, principles, and guidelines that were used as the basis for the assessment.]

### 3.2 Compliance Evaluation

| Standard Category | Compliance Level | Gaps Identified | Impact | Remediation Priority |
|------------------|------------------|-----------------|--------|---------------------|
| [Category] | [Full/Partial/Non-compliant] | [Description of gaps] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] |
| [Category] | [Full/Partial/Non-compliant] | [Description of gaps] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] |
| [Category] | [Full/Partial/Non-compliant] | [Description of gaps] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] |

### 3.3 Detailed Gap Analysis

#### 3.3.1 [Standard Category 1]

[Provide detailed analysis of gaps in this category, including specific examples, root causes, and implications.]

#### 3.3.2 [Standard Category 2]

[Provide detailed analysis of gaps in this category, including specific examples, root causes, and implications.]

#### 3.3.3 [Standard Category 3]

[Provide detailed analysis of gaps in this category, including specific examples, root causes, and implications.]

## 4. Technical Debt Assessment

### 4.1 Technical Debt Summary

[Provide an overview of the technical debt identified during the assessment, including categories and severity levels.]

### 4.2 Detailed Technical Debt Analysis

| Debt Item | Description | Category | Impact | Remediation Effort | Priority |
|-----------|-------------|----------|--------|-------------------|----------|
| [Item] | [Description] | [Category] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] |
| [Item] | [Description] | [Category] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] |
| [Item] | [Description] | [Category] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] |

### 4.3 Obsolescence Risks

[Identify components, technologies, or platforms that are approaching end-of-life or are already unsupported, and assess the associated risks.]

## 5. Strategic Alignment Evaluation

### 5.1 Business-IT Alignment

[Assess how well the current architecture supports business strategy, objectives, and capabilities. Identify misalignments and gaps.]

### 5.2 Technology Roadmap Alignment

[Evaluate how the current architecture aligns with the organization's technology roadmap and strategic direction.]

### 5.3 Industry Trends Alignment

[Assess how the architecture compares to industry trends, innovations, and best practices in the relevant domain.]

## 6. Architecture Quality Assessment

### 6.1 Scalability and Performance

[Evaluate the architecture's ability to scale and perform under expected growth and peak loads.]

### 6.2 Security and Compliance

[Assess the architecture's security posture and compliance with relevant regulations and standards.]

### 6.3 Resilience and Reliability

[Evaluate the architecture's resilience to failures and its overall reliability characteristics.]

### 6.4 Maintainability and Extensibility

[Assess how maintainable and extensible the architecture is, considering factors like modularity, coupling, and documentation.]

### 6.5 Cost Efficiency

[Evaluate the cost efficiency of the architecture, including operational costs, licensing, and resource utilization.]

## 7. Risk Assessment

### 7.1 Risk Summary

[Provide an overview of the architectural risks identified during the assessment.]

### 7.2 Detailed Risk Analysis

| Risk | Description | Likelihood | Impact | Risk Level | Mitigation Strategy |
|------|-------------|------------|--------|------------|---------------------|
| [Risk] | [Description] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Strategy] |
| [Risk] | [Description] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Strategy] |
| [Risk] | [Description] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Strategy] |

## 8. Recommendations

### 8.1 Quick Wins

[Identify immediate improvements that can be implemented with relatively low effort and risk.]

| Recommendation | Description | Business Value | Implementation Effort | Timeline |
|----------------|-------------|---------------|----------------------|----------|
| [Recommendation] | [Description] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Timeline] |
| [Recommendation] | [Description] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Timeline] |
| [Recommendation] | [Description] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Timeline] |

### 8.2 Strategic Improvements

[Recommend longer-term, strategic architectural improvements that address fundamental issues and align with business strategy.]

| Recommendation | Description | Business Value | Implementation Effort | Timeline |
|----------------|-------------|---------------|----------------------|----------|
| [Recommendation] | [Description] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Timeline] |
| [Recommendation] | [Description] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Timeline] |
| [Recommendation] | [Description] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Timeline] |

### 8.3 Target Architecture Vision

[Describe the recommended target architecture that addresses the identified gaps and aligns with business strategy. Include high-level architecture diagrams.]

## 9. Implementation Roadmap

### 9.1 Implementation Approach

[Describe the recommended approach for implementing the architectural improvements, including phasing, dependencies, and key considerations.]

### 9.2 Implementation Timeline

[Provide a visual roadmap with key milestones and dependencies for implementing the recommendations.]

### 9.3 Resource Requirements

[Outline the resources (people, skills, tools, funding) required to implement the recommendations.]

### 9.4 Success Metrics

[Define metrics to measure the success of the architectural improvements.]

| Metric | Current Value | Target Value | Measurement Approach |
|--------|--------------|-------------|---------------------|
| [Metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [Approach] |
| [Metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [Approach] |
| [Metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [Approach] |

## 10. Conclusion

[Summarize the key findings, recommendations, and next steps. Emphasize the business value of addressing the identified issues and implementing the recommendations.]

## Appendices

### Appendix A: Assessment Methodology

[Provide details on the assessment methodology, including frameworks, tools, and techniques used.]

### Appendix B: Detailed Findings

[Include detailed findings that support the main assessment but are too detailed for the main body of the document.]

### Appendix C: Reference Architecture Models

[Include reference architecture models that can guide the implementation of recommendations.]

### Appendix D: Glossary

[Define key terms and acronyms used in the document.]

### Appendix E: References

[List references to standards, frameworks, and other documents used in the assessment.]
```
